Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz - Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

Get Ai Page

get_ai_page
Read-only

WHAT: Fetches public https://www.ikeytz.com/ai-pages/{locale}/{file}.txt (HTML-parity fulltext for one marketing URL). path=/ → index.txt; else path without leading slash + .txt. summary = first 4000 chars; truncated=true if longer. USE for page body text — not site-wide crawl/train policy (that is get_ai_txt on /.well-known/ai.txt). Not get_serp_snippet (title/description only). /review has no HTML-parity footer. NEXT: get_serp_snippet for meta only; get_ai_txt for ai-train=no policy.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesRequired. Marketing path: / , /preise , /en/preise , /schluesseldienst-ludwigsburg-pattonville , /auswahl/tuer-zugefallen . Locale prefix in the path overrides args.locale if present.
localeNoHTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
pathNoResolved path
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
aiPageUrlNohttps://www.ikeytz.com/ai-pages/{locale}/….txt
truncatedNotrue if body was cut at 4000 chars
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover readOnlyHint=true, so the description carries real behavioral weight: it discloses the URL construction pattern, the path=→index.txt resolution rule, the 4000-char summary truncation with a truncated flag, and the /review no-footer edge case. It stops short of describing error behavior or rate limits, but adds strong context beyond the single annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

WHAT/USE/NEXT labeling front-loads purpose, then routing, then follow-ups, with zero filler sentences. Telegraphic shorthand is dense but every clause carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value documentation is not needed; the description still covers purpose, sibling routing, path resolution, and truncation. For a 2-param read tool this is fully adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is already 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds the file-mapping semantics (path=/ → index.txt; else path stripped of leading slash + .txt) that the schema does not state. This gives an agent the derived request target rather than only the parameter format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (fetches) and resource (HTML-parity fulltext for one marketing URL), and proactively names the siblings it is not (get_ai_txt, get_serp_snippet). An agent can distinguish it from the other 'get_ai_*' and 'get_serp_*' tools without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'USE for page body text — not site-wide crawl/train policy (that is get_ai_txt)' and 'Not get_serp_snippet (title/description only)' give when-to-use, when-not, and the exact alternative for each case. Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources