Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz – Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

Compose Whatsapp

compose_whatsapp
Read-only

WHAT: Build a https://wa.me/… URL with one prefab = one end-invoice (or mount 49 / beratung). option = contactOption from get_prices.composition.endInvoices or get_invoice_line_items.contactOption: opening_slam_day|opening_slam_night|opening_locked_day|opening_locked_night|pkg_key_slam_day|pkg_key_slam_night|pkg_key_locked_day|pkg_key_locked_night|cylinder_only_day|cylinder_only_night|cylinder_mount|beratung. Deprecated aliases zugefallen|abgeschlossen|zylinder map to the day invoice and set ambiguous=true — do not use them. Omit/unknown → beratung. 49 € is mount, not night. Does not send WhatsApp. List via list_whatsapp_options.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
optionNoOne invoice contactOption. Night/WE/holiday uses *_night (149/179/198/228/119), not 49. cylinder_mount is the 49 € add-on, not an end-invoice.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
hrefNohttps://wa.me/… URL
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
optionNoResolved contactOption id
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
whenKeyNo
ambiguousNo
amountEurNo
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.
isEndInvoiceNo
situationKeyNo

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond readOnlyHint=true, the description reveals key behaviors: building a URL does not send a message, omitted/unknown option defaults to beratung, and deprecated aliases set ambiguous=true. It also disambiguates the 49 € value as cylinder mount rather than a night invoice. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loads the core function in the first sentence, then packs defaults and deprecations efficiently. The pipe-delimited option list is dense but every sentence earns its place, though some phrasing is telegraphic.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one optional parameter, enum schema, output schema, and readOnly annotation, the description covers default behavior, deprecated values, source of options, and the non-sending behavior. Nothing essential for correct invocation is missing; it even references list_whatsapp_options for additional options.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the option enum and its description at 100% coverage. The description adds value by explaining the default fallback for omitted/unknown values and the deprecated alias mapping, which the schema does not state. Base 3 plus one for extra semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Build a https://wa.me/… URL'. Explicitly narrows scope with 'Does not send WhatsApp' and names the list tool alternative, distinguishing it from compose_mailto/compose_tel siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tells the agent where valid option values come from ('contactOption from get_prices.composition.endInvoices or get_invoice_line_items.contactOption'), warns against deprecated aliases ('do not use them'), and points to list_whatsapp_options for listing. It does not explicitly contrast with the other compose_* tools, but the channel-specific name plus these instructions provide adequate guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have clearly distinct roles, but there is real overlap: get_discovery duplicates get_llms_txt/get_llms_mcp_server/get_sitemap_txt, get_it and get_mcp_hub describe the same machines, and get_page_summary is a stub that competes with get_ai_page/get_serp_snippet. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among the discovery and pointer tools.

Naming Consistency4/5

The overwhelming majority follow a consistent snake_case verb-noun pattern: get_*, list_*, compose_*, resolve_*. Minor deviations like site_overview, get_it, and find_by_keyword are readable but break the dominant convention.

Tool Count2/5

45 tools for a single small-business website is excessive and well above the 25+ threshold. Many tools are pointer/list aliases or discovery-file accessors that could be consolidated without losing capability.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are well covered: identity, contact, emergency info, pricing, invoicing, service areas, FAQs, legal pages, and generic page content via get_ai_page. Minor gaps exist around explicit opening-hours details, existing customer reviews, and maps-domain functionality, but these are mostly declared out of scope rather than dead ends.

Resources