Skip to main content
Glama

Hoplix Print on Demand

Get order details

get_order
Read-onlyIdempotent

Full details of one order: date, your reference, status, shipping cost, tracking and the ordered products. Accepts real order ids and test order ids (TEST-...).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "order_id": "<order_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_order"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
order_idYesHoplix order id, or a TEST-... id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that test ids ('TEST-...') are accepted alongside real ids, which is genuinely useful behavioral context, but it repeats what the order_id schema field already says and says nothing about failure modes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with zero waste: the returned payload is front-loaded and the id-type caveat follows. Nothing is redundant or padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read tool with full annotation coverage and no output schema, the description is close to sufficient: it tells the agent what comes back and that test ids work. It lacks only minor points such as behavior for nonexistent or malformed ids.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single order_id parameter, so the schema already documents it fully. The description reinforces the real-vs-TEST id distinction but adds no new syntax, format, or validation detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('Full details of one order') and enumerates the returned fields (date, reference, status, shipping cost, tracking, products), which implicitly separates it from list_orders and get_order_status. It stops short of explicitly naming those siblings, so the differentiation is inferred rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: look up a single known order id to see its full record. There is no guidance on when to prefer get_order_status for a lightweight status check or list_orders for discovery, and no stated prerequisites or error behavior for unknown ids.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.