Skip to main content
Glama

start_job

Start a background job on Hook Detector's job runner. Only echo can be started by hand: it waits seconds and answers message back with how many attempts it took (a job survives a deploy). At most 3 an hour per account. Free. Same as POST /v1/jobs; read it back with get_job.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "start_job"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNoonly echo todayecho
api_keyNo
messageNo
secondsNo1 to 120

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden and does so well: it discloses that jobs survive deploys, the 3-per-hour account rate limit, that the operation is free, and that it matches POST /v1/jobs. It omits auth/API-key behavior and failure modes, which keeps it from a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the action, followed by the supported kind, behavior, limit, cost, and read-back pointer. It is dense but every sentence earns its place, with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the description covers job survival, rate limits, and how to retrieve the result via get_job. The main gap is the undocumented api_key parameter, which prevents a perfect score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning for message (echoed back with attempt count) and seconds (wait time), and reinforces that kind is only echo, but it says nothing about api_key, leaving one parameter undocumented in both schema and prose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: start a background job on Hook Detector's job runner. It also names the only supported job kind (echo), which makes the tool's purpose unambiguous against siblings like get_job or list_jobs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear usage context: only echo can be started by hand, there is a rate limit of 3 per hour per account, and the job should be read back with get_job. It stops short of explicitly naming when not to use the tool beyond the single-job-kind constraint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources