Skip to main content
Glama

Hedgenaru Korean Stocks

종목 찾기

search_stocks
Read-onlyIdempotent

한국 상장 종목(KOSPI·KOSDAQ)을 이름·초성·영문명·코드로 찾아 6자리 종목코드를 돌려준다. 다른 도구에 넣을 symbol 을 모를 때 먼저 부른다.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "query": "<query>"
    },
    "name": "search_stocks"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo최대 결과 수 (기본 10, 최대 30)
queryYes종목명 일부, 초성(ㅅㅅㅈㅈ), 영문명, 코드 앞자리

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/non-open-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value beyond them by naming the market scope (only KOSPI·KOSDAQ) and the exact return shape (6-digit code), though it says nothing about ambiguity or multi-match handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero padding, with the capability and the routing instruction both front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter lookup tool with no output schema, the description supplies the market scope and return type an agent needs. It could optionally clarify whether multiple matches are returned as a list, but nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema documents both the query forms and the limit bounds (default 10, max 30). The description's mention of name/초성/English/code largely restates schema content, so it adds little new parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (찾아) and resource (한국 상장 종목 KOSPI·KOSDAQ), the lookup keys (이름·초성·영문명·코드), and the concrete return value (6자리 종목코드). This clearly positions it as the symbol-resolver relative to the sibling data tools, which all consume a symbol.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent when to call it: before other tools when the symbol is unknown ("symbol 을 모를 때 먼저 부른다"). There is no explicit when-not or named alternative, but for a resolver tool the positive condition is the operative one.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources