List Rick Hebert's three booking formats (each custom-quoted): Strolling Close-Up, The Stand-Up Show, and The Full Evening. Use to help a user choose a format before booking.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It states the tool lists three custom-quoted formats, but does not disclose potential behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or whether the list is static. For a simple read operation, this is adequate but not thorough.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the action and resource. Every sentence adds value without redundancy. It is appropriately sized and structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and a simple listing task, the description is complete. It provides the list content, the custom-quoted nature, and the usage context, leaving no gaps for an agent to misinterpret.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100% (trivial). The description adds no parameter information because none is needed. A baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists three specific booking formats for Rick Hebert, each custom-quoted, and explains the purpose of helping the user choose before booking. It distinguishes itself from siblings like book_event and get_contact.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly says 'Use to help a user choose a format before booking,' indicating the tool should be used before booking to select a package. It does not explicitly exclude other contexts or name alternatives, but the context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool addresses a distinct need: booking, contact info, and package listing. No overlap.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (book_event, get_contact, list_packages).
3 tools are appropriate for a focused booking server, covering core user actions without bloat.
Covers essential operations (info, contact, booking). A minor gap might be a cancellation tool, but the surface is adequate for the stated purpose.