get_contact
Get Rick Hebert's contact details (phone, email) and the area he serves. Use when the user wants to reach Rick directly or asks where he performs.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Get Rick Hebert's contact details (phone, email) and the area he serves. Use when the user wants to reach Rick directly or asks where he performs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, but the description implies a safe read-only operation (getting details) with no side effects, adequately compensating for missing annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise, front-loaded sentences with no wasted words: purpose first, then usage guidance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, description fully covers what data is returned and when to use it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; schema coverage is trivially 100%. Baseline score of 4 applies as no additional parameter info needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it retrieves Rick Hebert's contact details (phone, email) and service area, distinguishing it from sibling tools book_event and list_packages which have different purposes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit guidance: use when the user wants to reach Rick directly or asks where he performs, providing clear when-to-use criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool addresses a distinct need: booking, contact info, and package listing. No overlap.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (book_event, get_contact, list_packages).
3 tools are appropriate for a focused booking server, covering core user actions without bloat.
Covers essential operations (info, contact, booking). A minor gap might be a cancellation tool, but the surface is adequate for the stated purpose.