Skip to main content
Glama

Google Search Remote MCP Server

google_serp_short_videos: GET /

hasdata_google_serp_short_videos_getShortVideosSearchResults

Get Short Videos Search Results

Scrapes the Google Short Videos carousel (TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels, etc.) for a query with location/uule, country (gl/cr), language (hl/lr), device type, and page-based pagination. Supports Google's advanced filters (tbs). Returns video title, thumbnail, duration, source platform, channel/creator, publish date, direct video URL, the platform's video ID and profile handle, and ready-to-call HasData API links (hasdataLinks) for the video's comments, transcript, profile, posts or channel. Use for short-form content discovery, viral-trend monitoring, influencer research, cross-platform video aggregation, and sourcing short clips to summarize or embed in LLM responses.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYesSearch query term for retrieving short videos results.
crNoThe country code for the country you want to limit the search to. Provide one exact documented value (237 allowed), e.g. `countryAF`, `countryAL`.
glNoThe two-letter country code for the country you want to limit the search to. Provide one exact documented value (245 allowed), e.g. `ac`, `af`.
hlNoThe two-letter language code for the language you want to use for the search. Provide one exact documented value (159 allowed), e.g. `af`, `ak`.
lrNoThe 'lr' parameter specifies the language of the websites to return results from. This parameter filters results based on the language of the web content.
tbsNoGoogle advanced search filters, combined with commas. For example: - `qdr:h`, `qdr:d`, `qdr:w`, `qdr:m`, `qdr:y` - Show videos from the past hour, day, week, month, or year.
pageNoPage number for paginated results, where 0 is the first page.
uuleNoThe encoded location parameter.
locationNoGoogle canonical location for the search.
deviceTypeNoSpecify the device type for the search.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / tbs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Google advanced search filters, combined with commas. For example:\n\n  - `qdr:h`, `qdr:d`, `qdr:w`, `qdr:m`, `qdr:y` - Show videos from the past hour, day, week, month, or year.\n",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses page-based pagination (0-indexed), tbs filter support, per-platform provenance fields, and that it returns ready-to-call HasData API links for comments/transcript/profile. It omits auth requirements, rate limits, and failure modes, so not a full 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action and target, then scoped parameters, then return values, then use cases. The second sentence is dense but every clause (filters, return fields, hasdataLinks) adds distinct information, so it earns its length despite being long.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 10-parameter scraping tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description compensates well by enumerating the returned fields and the linked follow-up endpoints. It lacks any note on authentication or result limits, which would complete the picture.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 10 parameters in detail (including enums and examples). The description only lists parameter families (location/uule, gl/cr, hl/lr, deviceType, page) without adding format or constraint detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Scrapes') and a precise resource ('the Google Short Videos carousel') and enumerates the covered platforms (TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like youtube_search_getYoutubeSearchResults or tiktok_search_getTikTokSearch, which target single platforms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides concrete usage contexts ('short-form content discovery, viral-trend monitoring, influencer research, cross-platform video aggregation, sourcing short clips to summarize or embed in LLM responses'). However it never states when NOT to use it or names an alternative tool (e.g., a single-platform search) for narrower needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.