Skip to main content
Glama

SEO GSC Wizard MCP

Bing crawl issues

get_bing_crawl_issues
Read-only

Use this when the user asks which of their URLs Bing has trouble crawling. URLs where Bing found crawl issues for a property: HTTP 4xx/5xx, 301/302 redirects, robots.txt blocks, DNS/timeout errors and malware, each with the HTTP code, inbound-link count, and decoded human-readable issue labels. Rows are sorted by inbound links, most first, then by URL A to Z. Not for daily crawl totals: use get_bing_crawl_stats; for Google's view of one URL use inspect_url. Returns notConfigured: true when no Bing Webmaster API key is set up for the property.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax issue URLs to return, most inbound links first (default 200, uncapped).
siteUrlYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hintNo
rangeNo
issuesNo
thenByNo
listKeyNoName of the top-level field that holds the rows sortedBy describes.
siteUrlNo
warningNo
nextStepNo
orderingNo
rowCountNo
sortedByNo
dateBasisNo
sortOrderNo
thenOrderNo
dataSourceNo
bingSiteUrlNo
partialDaysNoRequested days among Bing's newest (provisional) or after latestDataDate (missing, not zero), up to today.
completenessNo
emptyBecauseNo
methodLimitsNo
notConfiguredNo
latestDataDateNoNewest date with a row in everything Bing sent for this call, before the window filter.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / completeness
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / dateBasis
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / issues / items / properties / issues / $ref
      Added value: +"#/properties/partialDays"
    • removedOutput schema / properties / issues / items / properties / issues / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / latestDataDate
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl",
      +  "description": "Newest date with a row in everything Bing sent for this call, before the window filter."
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listKey
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl",
      +  "description": "Name of the top-level field that holds the rows sortedBy describes."
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / partialDays
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Requested days among Bing's newest (provisional) or after latestDataDate (missing, not zero), up to today."
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / warning
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
  2. Changed11 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -falseNew value: +true
    • addedOutput schema / properties / emptyBecause
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / issues / items / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -falseNew value: +true
    • addedOutput schema / properties / methodLimits
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / nextStep
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ordering
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "sortOrder": {
      +            "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +          },
      +          "sortedBy": {
      +            "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +          },
      +          "thenBy": {
      +            "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +          },
      +          "thenOrder": {
      +            "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ]
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / range / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": false,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "days": {
      -        "type": [
      -          "number",
      -          "null"
      -        ]
      -      },
      -      "endDate": {
      -        "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      -      },
      -      "startDate": {
      -        "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "type": "object"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "days": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "number",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "endDate": {
      +        "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +      },
      +      "startDate": {
      +        "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sortOrder
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sortedBy
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / thenBy
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / thenOrder
      Added value: +{
      +  "$ref": "#/properties/siteUrl"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safe-read profile (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint=false), but the description adds genuinely new behavioral facts: the sort order (inbound links desc, then URL A-Z) and the 'notConfigured: true' state when no Bing API key exists for the property. The remaining row-level field listing is largely duplicative of the output schema, keeping it just short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the usage trigger, then issue types, then ordering, then exclusions — a sensible priority order with no filler sentences. Slightly dense in the middle enumeration, but every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema and annotations already present, the description only needs to add what structure can't express: the use case, the sort order, and the notConfigured failure mode. All three are covered; the only minor hole is siteUrl formatting, which is a parameter-level rather than completeness-level gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 50% and the undocumented parameter is siteUrl — the required one. The description says issues are returned 'for a property' but never specifies the expected URL format (bare domain vs. full URL vs. Bing site identifier), so an agent must guess. The 'limit' semantics are fully handled by the schema, which is why this sits at the baseline rather than lower.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('which of their URLs Bing has trouble crawling') and enumerates the exact issue classes returned (4xx/5xx, redirects, robots.txt blocks, DNS/timeout, malware) plus the fields attached to each row. It is clearly distinguishable from get_bing_crawl_stats and inspect_url, which are named outright.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Opens with an explicit trigger ('Use this when the user asks which of their URLs Bing has trouble crawling') and adds two exclusions with the correct alternatives: daily crawl totals go to get_bing_crawl_stats, single-URL Google view goes to inspect_url. No inference required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources