Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the full parameter burden, and it does well on `rules` – explaining the { type, value } shape, the four match types, and regex edge cases – plus the name-uniqueness constraint. However, siteUrl, color, and description are never addressed, leaving half the parameters documented only by their bare JSON types.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.