Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It thoroughly documents siteUrl (URL prefix vs sc-domain form, case-insensitivity, trailing-slash normalization), but the second parameter `tags` is never mentioned, leaving it undocumented in both schema and description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.