Skip to main content
Glama

Gradient Dynamics: thermal and CFD simulation

List design templates

list_templates
Read-onlyIdempotent

List geometry families/templates with units and STEP capability. Use get_template for parameter bounds and output names before creating a design.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_templates"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNo
familyNo
exact_step_onlyNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds a useful content hint (units and STEP capability are included in entries) but says nothing about result size, filtering behavior, or pagination for a catalog listing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste, with the discovery purpose front-loaded before the follow-up call recommendation. Nothing to trim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. However, three filtering parameters with 0% description coverage go entirely unaddressed, which leaves an agent guessing whether and how to narrow the listing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for three filter parameters (kind, family, exact_step_only), so the schema itself gives no meaning. The description only glancingly implies filtering via 'STEP capability', leaving kind and family wholly unexplained. Baseline 3 is the ceiling because the schema documents no parameter intent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List geometry families/templates') and discloses what each entry carries (units, STEP capability). It differentiates itself from get_template by contrasting the summary listing with parameter bounds and output names, though it does not distinguish itself from the other list_* siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use this to discover templates, then call get_template for parameter bounds and output names before creating a design. That is a clear call sequence, but there is no guidance on when this tool is inappropriate or how it relates to the other list_* tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources