List all paid endpoints exposed by this MCP server with their prices and live status. Free — no wallet required. Use this first to discover what tools are available.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool is free and requires no wallet, which are key behavioral traits. It could add details about output format or pagination, but the transparency is sufficient for a simple list tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence front-loads the core function, and the second provides actionable guidance. Perfectly structured for quick comprehension.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and output. It explains what is listed (prices, live status) and that it's free, though it could specify the exact return structure. Overall, it's complete enough for its simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by explaining what the output contains (prices, live status) and that it's free, going beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists paid endpoints with prices and live status. It distinguishes itself from siblings by focusing on endpoint discovery, not installation, pricing info, usage, or wallet functions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly advises to use this tool first to discover available tools, providing clear timing context. It does not discuss when not to use it, but the guidance is direct and helpful.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools are clearly distinct, but list_endpoints and pricing_info both expose endpoint and pricing details, which could cause an agent to call the wrong one. install_snippets, usage_stats, and wallet_helper have separate, well-defined purposes.
All names use lowercase snake_case, but the style is mixed: install_snippets and list_endpoints follow verb_noun, while pricing_info, usage_stats, and wallet_helper are noun-based. The naming is readable but not uniform.
Five tools is a reasonable, compact set for an onboarding and payment-helper server. However, for a server branded as 'Data Enrichment', the count reflects meta-support tooling rather than actual enrichment capabilities.
The set covers installation, endpoint discovery, pricing, usage stats, and wallet setup, but it includes no actual data-enrichment operations. Given the stated purpose, agents cannot perform the primary task through these tools.