Skip to main content
Glama

Glasswarp

by com.glasswarp

session.live_view

Read-only

Return the console Live View URL (≈60fps) for the rig owner to watch and intervene. Read-only for the agent — does not grant the API key console access. Offer on long or sensitive tasks. Owner must be signed into Glasswarp; API keys alone cannot open the player.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
session_idYesActive session id

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesFalse when the tool failed
messageYesHuman-readable result for the agent

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds beyond annotations by stating the tool is read-only for the agent and does not grant API key console access, plus the 60fps performance. No contradiction with annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint). Could include error handling details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. Front-loaded with main action and key details. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the return value is likely documented. Description covers what it returns (URL). Lacks mention of potential errors but sufficient for a simple tool with one required parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter session_id is described in schema (100% coverage). Description does not add additional meaning or constraints beyond 'active session id'. Baseline maintained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it returns a console Live View URL at ~60fps for owner intervention. Distinct from sibling tools like session.status or screen.observe by providing a real-time interactive view.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Advises to offer on long or sensitive tasks and notes the owner must be signed into Glasswarp, which helps in deciding when to use. Does not explicitly compare to sibling tools but provides practical context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Glasswarp toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: session management, input methods, screen observation, demo retrieval, and rig listing. Descriptions explicitly state when to prefer one over another (e.g., click_target over click_xy, send_actions over chaining). No two tools overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the domain.verb_noun pattern (e.g., app.launch, input.click_target, session.start) with consistent snake_case. Verbs like launch, list, get, click, send, type, observe are clear actions, and the naming is predictable across the entire set.

Tool Count5/5

16 tools cover the full spectrum of remote desktop control: 2 for demos, 1 for rigs, 4 for sessions, 1 for screen, 7 for input, and 1 for app launching. Each tool is necessary and there is no redundancy; the count is well-scoped for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides a complete lifecycle for remote desktop interaction: rig selection, session start/end, screen observation, all common input actions (click, type, scroll, drag, multi-step sequences), app launching, and demo retrieval. There are no obvious gaps for typical UI automation tasks.

Resources