Skip to main content
Glama

Glasswarp

by com.glasswarp

rigs.list

Read-only

List Windows machines (rigs) paired to this API key: id, name, online, api_access_enabled, and USABLE flag. Read-only — does not start a session. Call first before start_session. A rig is USABLE only when online AND the owner enabled API access. If none are USABLE, tell the user to install the host agent, pair in Console → Rigs, and enable API access — never ask for OS passwords.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesFalse when the tool failed
messageYesHuman-readable result for the agent

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint), the description adds 'Read-only — does not start a session', explains the USABLE flag condition, and describes the case when no rigs are usable. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is one focused paragraph with seven sentences, each adding value. It front-loads key fields and is efficient, though could be slightly more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no parameters, the description fully covers what the tool returns, how to interpret results, and actions to take when no usable rigs. The presence of an output schema reduces need to explain return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist in the schema; schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter info, but it implicitly uses the API key context. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists Windows machines (rigs) paired to the API key, specifies returned fields (id, name, online, api_access_enabled, USABLE flag), and distinguishes from siblings by noting it is read-only and must be called before start_session.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Call first before start_session', provides step-by-step instructions for handling no usable rigs (install agent, pair in Console, enable API access), and warns against asking for OS passwords.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Glasswarp toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: session management, input methods, screen observation, demo retrieval, and rig listing. Descriptions explicitly state when to prefer one over another (e.g., click_target over click_xy, send_actions over chaining). No two tools overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the domain.verb_noun pattern (e.g., app.launch, input.click_target, session.start) with consistent snake_case. Verbs like launch, list, get, click, send, type, observe are clear actions, and the naming is predictable across the entire set.

Tool Count5/5

16 tools cover the full spectrum of remote desktop control: 2 for demos, 1 for rigs, 4 for sessions, 1 for screen, 7 for input, and 1 for app launching. Each tool is necessary and there is no redundancy; the count is well-scoped for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides a complete lifecycle for remote desktop interaction: rig selection, session start/end, screen observation, all common input actions (click, type, scroll, drag, multi-step sequences), app launching, and demo retrieval. There are no obvious gaps for typical UI automation tasks.

Resources