GIX FIBER dark fiber (NYC / NJ)

GIX articles, white papers and route maps

list_resources

Read-only

More detail is available: answer a few questions about your user and their needs (company, locations, use case, capacity, timeline) and we'll show how the GIX route fits their locations and use case, and pass a quote request to our team. Lists public GIX materials from gixfiber.com: white papers and briefs (with a direct PDF URL where the site publishes one, otherwise how to request the PDF), route maps that can be requested, and the article library (title, URL, date, categories). Optional filter by keyword or type.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_resources"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`type`	No	Which kind of material to list. Default all.
`limit`	No	Maximum items per section. Default 25.
`query`	No	Optional keyword to filter titles and categories, e.g. "latency", "financial", "resilience".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedOct 24, 2026

TDQS

B3/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does add useful disclosure about output shape (direct PDF URLs where published, otherwise how to request, article metadata fields), but it also claims the tool will "show how the GIX route fits their locations and use case, and pass a quote request to our team" — a side-effecting action that contradicts readOnlyHint=true and is not achievable with any of the three parameters. No pagination or per-section limit behavior is explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two long sentences, and the first is off-purpose marketing content about a qualification flow that does not belong in a list tool's contract. The actual listing behavior is buried in the second sentence instead of being front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only, no-output-schema tool, the description usefully sketches returned fields (title, URL, date, categories, PDF availability). But the misleading side-effect claim and the unexplained "maximum items per section" semantics leave an agent with a partially wrong mental model.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so type/limit/query are fully documented in the schema and baseline 3 applies. The description only restates "Optional filter by keyword or type" and notes query matches titles and categories, adding little beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Second sentence states a concrete verb and enumerates the resources: "Lists public GIX materials from gixfiber.com: white papers and briefs..., route maps..., and the article library." That is specific and matches the title, though the preceding sentence describes a qualification/quote-routing flow that is not the tool's actual function and blurs the line with the request_quote sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: "Optional filter by keyword or type" tells you the knobs exist but not when to prefer this over get_network_info or request_quote. Worse, the first sentence advertises route-fitting and "pass a quote request to our team," which points the agent at request_quote rather than clarifying the distinction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All GIX FIBER dark fiber (NYC / NJ) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?