Skip to main content
Glama

Take a post scheduled elsewhere off

scheduled_posts_remove
Destructive

Takes one post off the list of posts scheduled outside Marsell, by its id from scheduled_posts_read, when it was called off. It stays on file as cancelled. A post that already went out stays.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "scheduled_posts_remove"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe post's id from scheduled_posts_read (el- and a uuid).
projectNoThe project's id or exact name. Optional when the account has one project.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the safety profile is known. The description adds useful behavior beyond that: the post remains on file as cancelled, and already-published posts cannot be removed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the main action. The phrase 'when it was called off' is slightly awkward, but there is no unnecessary wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation with no output schema, the description covers the key behavioral outcomes: soft cancellation and immutability of already-published posts. It does not explain return values or not-found behavior, but the schema already covers the parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the id and project parameters are already documented in the schema. The description repeats that the id comes from scheduled_posts_read but adds no new meaning for the optional project parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: taking one post off the list of posts scheduled outside Marsell, identified by its id. It clearly distinguishes removal from reading by pointing to scheduled_posts_read as the source of the id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear usage condition: use it when a scheduled post was called off. It also states an exclusion, that a post which already went out stays, but it does not explicitly name alternative tools or contrast with scheduled_posts_sync.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.