Skip to main content
Glama

Freezer take out

freezer_take_out

Takes one card out of the freezer, back to What needs you, as Take it out does there. It comes back saying its age first: how old the thread is, how long ago the trend stopped being current, the day the post was for (a post comes back without its day: its yes sends it at the next free time). It never goes back in by itself. Free. It needs an act key.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "card_id": "<card_id>"
    },
    "name": "freezer_take_out"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
card_idYesthe frozen card's id, from freezer_read
projectNoThe project's id or exact name. Optional when the account has one project.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description usefully adds that 'It never goes back in by itself' (no automatic undo) and that an 'act key' is required, plus what metadata is returned. However, the disclosure is phrased in riddles ('its yes sends it at the next free time') and never says what state the card ends in or how to restore it, so the mutation's real consequences stay murky.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short but badly front-loaded and riddled with unresolved referents ('as Take it out does there', 'its yes', 'Free'). Roughly half the sentences require a second read, so length is not the problem – clarity is.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity two-parameter mutation with full schema coverage and annotations covering the safety profile, the description covers return metadata and the no-auto-reinsert rule. It still omits the resulting state of the card and the recovery path, which matter for a state-changing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the card_id description already points at freezer_read, so the schema carries the load. The description adds no meaning beyond it – notably nothing about what 'act key' means in relation to card_id or the optional project.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The verb+resource pair ('Takes one card out of the freezer') is concrete and implicitly contrasts with the sibling freezer_read, so the action is identifiable. But the domain vocabulary ('freezer', 'card', 'What needs you') is never grounded, so an agent that doesn't already know the product can't be sure what object is being moved or where it lands.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'back to What needs you, as Take it out does there' gestures at a workflow but names no sibling, no precondition, and no exclusion. Nothing states when to choose this over freezer_read, set_aside, or waiting_read, nor what condition must hold before a card is eligible.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.