Skip to main content
Glama

publish_survey

Publish a survey to make it accessible via its share link.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
survey_idYesThe ID of the survey to publish.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states that the survey becomes accessible via its share link, but does not mention side effects, permissions needed, or reversibility. Lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. The verb 'Publish' is the first word, immediately conveying the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core functionality. It could mention prerequisites (e.g., survey must exist) or what happens after publish, but overall it's reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes survey_id. The description adds no parameter-specific details beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (publish), the resource (survey), and the outcome (accessible via share link). It distinguishes well from siblings like create_survey and get_survey_link.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like create_survey or get_survey_link. The usage is implied (after creating a survey), but no when-not-to-use or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools have distinct purposes, but create_survey and get_survey_link both involve shareable links, causing slight overlap. Otherwise clearly differentiated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, e.g., create_survey, get_responses, publish_survey.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools are well-scoped for a survey management server, covering creation, listing, publishing, and data retrieval without being excessive.

Completeness4/5

Core survey lifecycle is covered (create, publish, list, get responses, report), but missing update and delete operations are minor gaps.