Skip to main content
Glama

Save a GenAds media

native.genads_save_media
DestructiveIdempotent

Save a GenAds media. Use the exact saved revision; zero creates a new resource. Reuse operation_id after an uncertain response.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "work_id": "<work_id>",
      "arguments": "<arguments>",
      "expected_catalog_version": "<expected_catalog_version>",
      "read_skills": "<read_skills>",
      "request_key": "<request_key>"
    },
    "name": "native.genads_save_media"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
work_idYes
argumentsYes
read_skillsYesExact required native skills and their dependencies, copied from the accepted session bootstrap's skills array. Include only entries in that array. General mcp.* guides and native.{studio}.instructions are guidance, not native skill proofs.
request_keyYes
publication_proposal_idNoFor native Social scheduling, the exact server-approved publication proposal. This identifier cannot confer approval by itself.
expected_catalog_versionYesFor a new session, read a studios/{studio}/native/{pack} child toolset and copy invocation.catalog_version from a native tool descriptor. Do not use the top-level library version. For calls in an existing session, use that session proposal's catalog_version.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / arguments / properties / body / properties / settings / default / seedanceLevel
      Added value: +"mini_480p"
    • addedInput schema / properties / arguments / properties / body / properties / settings / default / videoQuality
      Added value: +"draft"
    • addedInput schema / properties / arguments / properties / body / properties / settings / default / videoResolution
      Added value: +"480p"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=true, so the description is not responsible for the safety profile. It does add useful context on revision semantics and retry-by-operation_id behavior, but says nothing about what a destructive save overwrites, what happens on a revision conflict, or how publication_proposal_id approval interacts with the write.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences with no filler, and the revision rule is front-loaded immediately after the purpose statement. Every sentence carries operational information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values need no explanation, but this is a destructive nested-body save with six parameters and the description omits conflict behavior, how it relates to sibling save tools, and the role of read_skills/catalog version beyond what the schema notes provide. Adequate but with clear gaps for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, and the description adds meaning only for expected_revision (zero means create) and operation_id (reuse for retries). It is silent on work_id, request_key, and the relationship between arguments.id and the nested body, leaving several undocumented top-level parameters to the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource ('Save a GenAds media'), so the basic action is unambiguous. However, it does not distinguish this from the many nearby save siblings such as save_genads_variant, save_genads_pack, or save_genads_concept, leaving the agent to infer which record type this tool targets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It supplies two narrow usage rules: a zero expected_revision creates a new resource, and operation_id should be reused after an uncertain response. There is no guidance on when to choose this tool over the other GenAds save tools, nor any prerequisite or call-ordering advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources