Skip to main content
Glama

Get Asset Delivery

get_asset_delivery
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve an authorized saved asset with a short-lived scoped playback/download grant.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "asset_id": "<asset_id>",
      "asset_revision": "<asset_revision>"
    },
    "name": "get_asset_delivery"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
asset_idYesOpaque authorized product identifier; never proof of access.
asset_revisionYesCurrent saved resource revision or source signature returned by Genflick.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior. The description adds that the grant is 'authorized' and 'short-lived scoped', which is useful behavioral context beyond annotations, though it does not detail authorization requirements or the grant's exact form.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the core action and scope. Every word contributes to the purpose; there is no wasted wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read-only tool with rich annotations and an output schema, the description is minimal but covers the core purpose. However, it omits guidance on when to choose this over list_assets or inspect_asset, leaving a gap for correct tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Retrieve'), resource ('authorized saved asset'), and scope ('short-lived scoped playback/download grant'). It does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like list_assets or inspect_asset, so the purpose is clear but lacks direct sibling routing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternatives are named. The phrase 'authorized saved asset' implies retrieval for playback/download, but the agent must infer when to choose this over inspecting or listing assets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources