Japan Toilet & Accessibility

get_municipality_context

Read-onlyIdempotent

Official Japanese government data for any municipality, one call — housing vacancy (2003–2023), nearest-station ridership trend, hazard categories, land prices, livability counts. No scores, no judgment — official values only. Accepts a 5-digit municipality code (13104) or an exact name (Shinjuku-ku / 新宿区).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`fields`	No	Optional comma-separated subset: vacancy,ridership,population,hazard,land_price,livability.
`name_or_code`	Yes	5-digit 全国地方公共団体コード (e.g. 13104) or exact municipality name (Shinjuku-ku / 新宿区).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`hazard`	No	Hazard categories.
`vacancy`	No	Housing-vacancy counts (2003–2023).
`ridership`	No	Nearest-station ridership trend.
`land_price`	No	Published land prices near the centroid.
`livability`	No	Livability counts.
`population`	No	Population / future estimate.
`attribution`	No	Data source(s), license and provenance — an object, or an array of sources.
`municipality`	No	Resolved municipality + code.
`hazard_disclaimer`	No	Hazard usage disclaimer.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedJul 12, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Official municipality data (vacancy, ridership, hazard, land price, livability).",
+  "properties": {
+    "attribution": {
+      "description": "Data source(s), license and provenance — an object, or an array of sources."
+    },
+    "hazard": {
+      "description": "Hazard categories."
+    },
+    "hazard_disclaimer": {
+      "description": "Hazard usage disclaimer."
+    },
+    "land_price": {
+      "description": "Published land prices near the centroid."
+    },
+    "livability": {
+      "description": "Livability counts."
+    },
+    "municipality": {
+      "description": "Resolved municipality + code."
+    },
+    "population": {
+      "description": "Population / future estimate."
+    },
+    "ridership": {
+      "description": "Nearest-station ridership trend."
+    },
+    "vacancy": {
+      "description": "Housing-vacancy counts (2003–2023)."
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedJul 5, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds behavioral context beyond these: it promises 'official values only' with no judgment, indicates a single aggregated call ('one call'), and specifies a data range for vacancy. It does not discuss rate limits or pagination, but the output schema covers return structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: scope/data categories, behavioral promise, and input format. No filler or redundancy, with key facts front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists and annotations cover safety, the description fully supports tool selection and invocation. It covers what the tool offers, how to specify the municipality, the optional fields concept, and the raw-data nature, making it complete for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are well-described. The description adds useful semantic context by explaining what the data fields mean (e.g., vacancy years 2003–2023, nearest-station ridership trend) and gives input examples, although the examples duplicate the schema description. This enriches parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides official Japanese government data for municipalities, listing specific data categories (vacancy, ridership, hazard, land price, livability). It distinguishes itself from sibling station/toilet tools by focusing on municipality-level official data, and the 'No scores, no judgment' note clarifies its non-analytical nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives strong context for when to use it: for official municipal data on multiple topics. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it (e.g., for station-specific alerts), but the scope is clear enough given the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Japan Toilet & Accessibility tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?