Skip to main content
Glama

Friday Flight Deals

open_friday_flight_deals
Read-only

Open the Friday Flight Deals app, which shows the latest cheap flight deals. If you call this, do not also call get_latest_deals.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "open_friday_flight_deals"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a genuine behavioral constraint (mutual exclusion with get_latest_deals) but says nothing about what happens after opening the app or whether any state changes, leaving the UI-navigation side effect of "open" undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler, and the core purpose is front-loaded before the exclusion rule. Every clause carries information the agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool whose annotations already carry the safety profile, the description covers what it does and the one non-obvious behavioral rule (don't pair with get_latest_deals). Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the schema-side burden is nil and the baseline is 4. There are no arguments whose meaning the description could clarify, and it correctly avoids inventing any.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Open the Friday Flight Deals app") plus what it surfaces ("the latest cheap flight deals"), so the agent knows exactly what this does. It names the sibling get_latest_deals, giving partial differentiation, but does not explain how opening the app differs functionally from that sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an explicit when-not rule: "do not also call get_latest_deals," naming the alternative directly. It stops short of a positive when-to-use trigger explaining which situation favors opening the app over the sibling tool, so guidance is clear but one-sided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources