Skip to main content
Glama

Get Issue Detail

get_issue
Read-only

Get full detail for one AI-detected issue: every occurrence with timestamps, the sessions behind it, steps to replicate, comments, and any linked Linear or Jira ticket. Get issueId from list_issues; use this only when you need the evidence behind one issue. An unknown id, or one from another website, fails with 'Issue not found'; on a free trial only the first 10 issues are available, and later ones fail as not included in the current plan. Each session lists its recording id, the anonymous visitorUid, start URL and page title, timing and event counts; no names, emails or locations are returned, so surface only what answers the question. Requires websiteId or domain with a workspace token.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainNoWebsite domain from list_websites (e.g. "example.com"). Alternative to websiteId with a workspace token.
issueIdYesIssue ID from list_issues
websiteIdNoWebsite ID from list_websites. Required with a workspace token unless domain is given; ignored with a website key.
workspaceIdNoWorkspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoObject with status and data: the issue with its occurrences, affected sessions, steps to replicate, comments, and external ticket link if any.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace do not exist in another",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / domain / description
      Previous value: -"Website domain to query. Required when using a workspace token unless websiteId is provided."New value: +"Website domain from list_websites (e.g. \"example.com\"). Alternative to websiteId with a workspace token."
    • changedInput schema / properties / websiteId / description
      Previous value: -"Website ID to query. Required when using a workspace token unless domain is provided."New value: +"Website ID from list_websites. Required with a workspace token unless domain is given; ignored with a website key."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / result / description
      Previous value: -"The issue with occurrences, affected sessions, steps to replicate, comments, and external ticket link if any."New value: +"Object with status and data: the issue with its occurrences, affected sessions, steps to replicate, comments, and external ticket link if any."
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the readOnlyHint/openWorldHint=false annotations by disclosing failure modes ('Issue not found' for unknown or cross-website ids), a plan limit ('on a free trial only the first 10 issues are available'), privacy constraints (no names, emails or locations), and the auth requirement (websiteId or domain with a workspace token).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and payload are front-loaded, and every sentence carries operational weight (routing, failure modes, plan limits, privacy, auth). It is dense and slightly long, but little is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not explain return fields, and it still covers the auth model, error conditions, plan gating, and data-sensitivity guidance. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning: it ties issueId to list_issues and spells out the websiteId/domain-with-token requirement that the schema only partially conveys. It stops short of documenting workspaceId behavior, which the schema already covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get full detail for one AI-detected issue') and enumerates the payload (occurrences, sessions, replication steps, comments, linked tickets). It clearly distinguishes itself from list_issues by framing itself as the evidence-level deep dive for a single issue.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: 'Get issueId from list_issues; use this only when you need the evidence behind one issue.' Names the source of the key parameter and the condition that selects this tool over the sibling listing tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources