Skip to main content
Glama

Get Publish Status

get_publish_status
Read-only

Read-only publish snapshot for a project: published (true/false, with the live URL when published), customDomains (the user's own domains attached to the project — apex and www are listed separately; empty when none), paid (the workspace owner has a paid plan, which allows removing the Floot badge), plan (free | pro | power — paid cannot tell Pro from Power), nativeBuilds (the owner's remaining monthly iOS/Android app-build allowance; unlimited is true on plans where the ceiling is only a fair-use backstop, and while an Action Boost is live (boostUntil says until when; builds started before then never count toward the allowance) — read this BEFORE passing mobile: true, and on a metered plan build only when the user asked for a native/TestFlight/Play build), displayFlootLogo (whether the live app shows the 'Made with Floot' badge; true until a paid owner turns it off), and mobileBuild (the project's latest native app build: building, succeeded, or failed with what to fix; isMobileTestMode marks a mobile test build — an app build finishes minutes AFTER the publish job it rode on, so read this to learn how it ended before telling the user it worked). This is the ONLY tool that reports attached custom domains — read it before telling a user whether their domain is connected, and never conclude a domain is unattached from any other output. The publish card calls this on load to render fresh state; also check it before publishing to know whether publish_app will publish fresh or publish the live app again.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only mark the call read-only/non-destructive; the description adds substantial behavior: paid vs plan distinctions, fair-use unlimited semantics, boostUntil timing, and the fact that mobileBuild finishes after its publish job. No contradiction with the readOnlyHint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every detail serves a purpose, but it is delivered as one long, dense run-on paragraph with deeply nested parentheticals. The core is front-loaded, but bulleted field breakdowns would make it far more scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the full burden of explaining return values, and it does so thoroughly: every response field, its possible values, and its caveats are described. An agent has enough to interpret the snapshot and decide next actions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one parameter, projectId, with 0% schema description coverage. The description repeatedly ties the data to 'a project' and 'the project's latest', giving semantic context, but it never states the expected identifier format or type beyond the schema's plain string.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a precise verb and object — 'Read-only publish snapshot for a project' — then enumerates the exact fields returned. It also differentiates from sibling outputs by stating it is 'the ONLY tool that reports attached custom domains'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use gates: read before asserting a domain is connected/unattached, read before passing mobile: true, and check before publish_app to know whether it will publish fresh. It also warns against concluding domains are unattached from any other output, effectively excluding alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources