Skip to main content
Glama

load_user_relevant_tools

Read-only

The Flexreport tools this user relies on most. Consider this as one of your first steps to create a personalized and consistent experience for the user. New users might not have any history. Empty responses can be expected.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "load_user_relevant_tools"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
as_of_dateNoMost used tools as of the date returned
relevant_toolsNoA list of a user's most used tool.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true already covers the safety profile, and the description adds genuinely new behavioral context: new users may have no history and empty responses are expected, which prevents the agent from treating an empty result as an error. It stops short of explaining how relevance is ranked or how many tools come back.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded, but the closing two sentences are redundant: "New users might not have any history" and "Empty responses can be expected" convey the same caveat twice and could be merged into one clause.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return-value details need no explanation, and the empty-result case is covered. What is missing is whether results should be refreshed or re-fetched within a session and how the returned tool list should influence subsequent tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the schema carries no semantics that the description needs to supplement. Baseline 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence states precisely what is returned: the Flexreport tools this user relies on most. It is a noun phrase rather than a verb+resource, but the resource (user's frequently used tools) is unambiguous and no sibling offers comparable behavior, so an agent can identify it immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Consider this as one of your first steps" gives explicit sequencing guidance and states the goal (personalized, consistent experience). It does not name an alternative or exclusion, but no sibling in the list performs this function, so the absence costs little.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources