Cross-sectional opportunity scan across every major and medium-cap coin at once — the screener the per-coin tools cannot be looped into safely. Two whole-universe feeds (the merged market snapshot + venue perp contexts) build a liquidity-filtered universe and rank it, then candles are fetched for a bounded shortlist only; ZERO per-symbol calls are made to the rate-limited derivatives provider, which is what lets this cover a universe without silently degrading. Up to eight signals per candidate: crowding (annualized funding vs the venue-standard anchor AND its percentile across the screened universe right now — a cross-sectional read, explicitly NOT the own-history percentile research_positioning reports; reported without a vote, because funding extremes have tended to continue rather than reverse), stress (24h long and short liquidations each as a share of open interest, both read on Bybit so the ratio is one book — longs flushed leans long, shorts flushed (a spent squeeze) leans short), leverage (open interest as a share of market cap — the gap-through-your-stop condition), compression (4h Bollinger bandwidth ranked against the coin's own trailing window — the per-coin form of the reading research_regime computes for BTC alone; says energy is loading, never direction), trend (ADX with the +DI/-DI separation on 4h, confirmed against 1d — votes +1 only for a strong 3:1 trend the slow timeframe agrees with), location (distance from the 4h EMA20 in ATR units — an extended coin scores DOWN, because a chase is not a setup), entry (whether the limit is still live) and reward (net-of-fees reward:risk and stop distance). Each signal reports its state, the numbers, and a +1/0/-1 setup-quality vote; the setup name and score come from a disclosed rule shipped with every scan, under which the reading that named the setup counts 0. Each candidate also says why it is worth a look now: its 24h price, OI (venue contracts) and volume against its own last 60 days, the plain-word labels those earn (longs building, short covering, crowded short, coiling, ...), and for each label what followed it in a 2-year backtest, verdict included (often 'no edge'). Priced setups carry their setup type's backtest track record (trades, win rate, average R after fees, against random entries). Each candidate says whether it is ACTIONABLE (a priced live entry, net reward:risk >= 1.5, score >= +1) and, when not, which gates it missed; actionable candidates rank first. Candidates carry ATR-and-structure trade plans priced so they feed research_trade_plan directly. A TRENDING PULLBACK is entered at market with its levels from the EMA20 pullback, taking half at +1R and moving the rest to breakeven (60% of 19,139 backtested trades won, about 0R on average, the same as random entries with those exits); an ABSORPTION SHORT (yesterday's Binance taker-buy share in the bottom 10% of the coin's own 60 days while the day closed flat or up) is a short at market, stop 2.5 ATR, target 2R, the one setup type that beat random entries in the backtest; a BREAKDOWN (24h drop in the bottom 5% of the coin's own 60 days) is a short at market; a COIL BREAKOUT (volatility squeezed, no trend) is a stop bracket around the 10-candle range. Stops sit behind the recent swing (a bracket's at the range midpoint), and targets at the structural level or 2R, whichever is nearer. Every priced plan carries its type's 2-year backtest record and a plain caveat; none of the three types passed a pre-registered edge test. No geometry is priced after a 24h move beyond ±30% or with a stop over 15% from entry, nor, for 7 days after BTC moves ±6% in 24h, for a TRENDING PULLBACK against that move (such plans lost in the backtest, in and out of sample; marketShock reports the active shock); the candidate says why. News is on the board but never scored: 'news.market' lists the last 24h's headlines after which BTC or ETH moved 1%+ (or a major coin 3%+) within the hour, and each candidate carries up to 3 headlines tagged with its coin (Tree of Alpha's feed, kept up to 48h by the server). Tokenized gold (XAUT, PAXG) is not screened, and one coin listed under two venue tickers (e.g. PUMP and PUMPFUN) is screened once. 'tier' filters major/medium/all; 'limit' caps the ranked list; 'symbols' narrows the universe to specific coins, and every symbol named there is accounted for individually in the response — selected, excluded by your own tier filter, below the liquidity floors (never screened, so no band was ever applied to it), below the tier floor, or not quoted at all — because mere absence from the ranked list conflates four different answers. Reports a board, not a forecast: the bands are disclosed constants chosen for plausibility with no backtest behind them, and 'NO CANDIDATES' is a real and frequent answer. Use it to pick what to look at, then research_positioning and ta_technicals on the two or three that stand out.