Cross-sectional opportunity scan across every major and medium-cap coin at once — the screener the per-coin tools cannot be looped into safely. Two whole-universe feeds (the merged market snapshot + venue perp contexts) build a liquidity-filtered universe and rank it, then candles are fetched for a bounded shortlist only; ZERO per-symbol calls are made to the rate-limited derivatives provider, which is what lets this cover a universe without silently degrading. Up to six signals per candidate: crowding (annualized funding vs the venue-standard anchor AND its percentile across the screened universe right now — a cross-sectional read, explicitly NOT the own-history percentile research_positioning reports), stress (24h liquidations as a share of open interest — whether forced sellers already cleared), leverage (open interest as a share of market cap — the gap-through-your-stop condition), compression (4h Bollinger bandwidth ranked against the coin's own trailing window — the per-coin form of the reading research_regime computes for BTC alone; says energy is loading, never direction), trend (ADX with the +DI/-DI separation on 4h, confirmed against 1d — the vote is withheld unless the slow timeframe agrees), and location (distance from the 4h EMA20 in ATR units — an extended coin scores DOWN, because a chase is not a setup). Each signal reports its state, the numbers, and a +1/0/-1 setup-quality vote; the setup name and score come from a disclosed rule shipped with every scan. Candidates carry ATR-and-structure geometry — a resting-limit entry at the EMA20 (never at market), a stop a full 2 ATR beyond it, and a target shaded inside the first structural level — priced so it feeds research_trade_plan directly. 'tier' filters major/medium/all; 'limit' caps the ranked list; 'symbols' narrows the universe to specific coins, and every symbol named there is accounted for individually in the response — selected, excluded by your own tier filter, below the liquidity floors (never screened, so no band was ever applied to it), below the tier floor, or not quoted at all — because mere absence from the ranked list conflates four different answers. Reports a board, not a forecast: the bands are disclosed constants chosen for plausibility with no backtest behind them, and 'NO CANDIDATES' is a real and frequent answer. Use it to pick what to look at, then research_positioning and ta_technicals on the two or three that stand out.