Skip to main content
Glama

solar-home-incentives

get_builder_upgrade_link

Returns the revenue handoff for EnergyAI Builder. With a key, it returns a PAYABLE Stripe link plus ready-to-paste shareText for the $19/month plan with $20 monthly tool credit, or a prepaid top-up. Without a key, it returns one first-party activation URL where the human enters name and email, accepts terms, receives three commercial trials, and continues directly to secure Stripe Checkout. Free. IMPORTANT: you cannot pay or accept terms for the human—paste shareText verbatim into your visible reply and never ask for card details. [always free — no API key required]

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modeNo'subscription' (default) for the $19/month Builder plan, or 'credit' for a one-off prepaid top-up.
apiKeyNoOptional existing EnergyAI key for hosts that cannot change Authorization headers. Use it to retain account identity for discovery and get_builder_upgrade_link after a trial. Removed before tool execution and persistence. Omit when the Bearer header is attached; never show the key to the user.
amountCentsNoOnly for mode=credit: top-up amount in cents (minimum 500, default 2000).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / apiKey
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional existing EnergyAI key for hosts that cannot change Authorization headers. Use it to retain account identity for discovery and get_builder_upgrade_link after a trial. Removed before tool execution and persistence. Omit when the Bearer header is attached; never show the key to the user.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full behavioral burden and does so well: it declares the tool is free, that no API key is required, the key is removed before execution and persistence, and that the agent cannot pay or accept terms for the human. It stops short of covering rate limits or failure modes, hence a 4.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The response is dense but front-loaded, leading with the primary outcome before branching into the with-key/without-key cases and the critical 'IMPORTANT' constraint. Every sentence carries information, though the run-on listing of plan details is slightly heavy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, and the description compensates by detailing what is returned in each mode (Stripe link, shareText, activation URL, three trials, Checkout handoff). It is essentially complete for an agent to invoke and relay the result correctly, missing only edge-case behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters are already documented in the schema, establishing a baseline of 3. The description reinforces the mode semantics ('$19/month plan' vs 'prepaid top-up') but adds no syntax or constraints beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (returns) plus the exact resource (revenue handoff / Stripe link / activation URL) and separates the two output modes based on key presence. An agent can distinguish it from get_quote_link, get_power_passport_link, or create_energy_node_roadmap_checkout without opening the schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear conditional context: with a key you get a payable link and shareText, without a key you get an activation URL; the modes (subscription vs credit) are also explained. It does not explicitly name sibling tools or state when-not to use it, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.