Skip to main content
Glama

solar-home-incentives

create_builder_key

Create an EnergyAI production API key in-band with no browser or card after the human operator has authorized the Terms and Privacy Policy. Returns a live key plus three commercial trial calls. Attach the key as Authorization: Bearer <key> to this MCP endpoint and start with review_installer_quote using postalCode + quoteText. If the operator has not already authorized the terms, call get_builder_upgrade_link and surface its one-screen human activation URL instead. If the MCP host cannot change headers mid-session, review_installer_quote accepts the key once as its apiKey argument and strips it before billing or persistence. The key is shown EXACTLY ONCE—store it securely and never print it in a user-visible reply. [always free — no API key required]

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesName of the agent, product, or operator claiming the key (2-120 chars). Shown only on your own account.
acceptTermsYesMust be true, and only after the human operator has authorized acceptance of the EnergyAI Terms and Privacy Policy. If authorization is not already documented, call get_builder_upgrade_link and surface its one-screen activation URL instead.
intendedUseNoOPTIONAL, one line: what you plan to build. Used only to prioritize the roadmap.
contactEmailNoOPTIONAL. Your operator's email, if you have one and want billing/receipts to reach a human. Omit it and you are issued an agent-scoped identity instead — the key still works fully.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It discloses key one-time display ('EXACTLY ONCE'), storage/printing restrictions, bearer token usage, the fallback apiKey argument that strips the key, trial calls, and that the endpoint is 'always free'. This is rich behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, then delivers usage, fallback, integration, and security notes in a dense but efficient single paragraph. Every sentence adds value with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no annotations and no output schema, the description covers the full lifecycle: creation, alternative flow, authentication, follow-up call, and safety handling. It provides enough context for an agent to use the tool correctly and avoid security pitfalls.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description reinforces the acceptTerms authorization condition and agent-scoped identity for omitted contactEmail, but these are already in the schema. It does not add significant new parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create an EnergyAI production API key' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by explicitly mentioning the alternative get_builder_upgrade_link when terms are not authorized.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance: call this tool only after the operator has authorized terms; otherwise use get_builder_upgrade_link. It also gives follow-up instructions with review_installer_quote and how to pass the key.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools are clearly distinct, but the three installer-related tools (find_local_installers, get_quote_link, route_lead) share the purpose of connecting users to installers and require careful reading of descriptions to avoid misselection. Other overlapping pairs like get_guide/list_guides and check_incentives are well differentiated by dynamic vs. static content.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case (check, create, estimate, find, get, list, route). Multiple get_* tools are uniform, and the naming makes the action and object clear. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped. Each tool serves a distinct role: informational lookup, estimation, guide access, installer connection, and commercial account management. The count is within the ideal 3–15 range and matches the server's broad but coherent purpose.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the core workflows: incentive checks, production estimates, guide exploration, installer discovery/quoting/lead routing, and commercial key management. No significant gaps are apparent; the only minor limitation is that installer tools are US-focused, but that seems intentional given the US-based guides and incentives data.