Skip to main content
Glama

eas_pricing

Read-onlyIdempotent

Where prices live and what costs nothing Pricing: {"unit": "call", "price_usd": 0, "free_quota": "200 per day per IP", "note": "Keyed volume pricing is published at https://app.eliteagenticsolutions.com/pricing"}.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "eas_pricing"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds real behavioral value beyond them: the concrete free quota (200/day per IP), the zero price per call, and the fact that volume pricing is external and must be fetched from a URL rather than returned by this tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short and front-loaded, with the key facts in a compact structured payload rather than prose. The leading sentence is slightly redundant with the payload that follows it, which is the only wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only informational tool with no output schema, the description supplies what an agent needs: the price, the free quota, and where volume pricing lives. It could be marginally clearer about whether the returned data is static or time-sensitive, but nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Baseline 4 applies; the description correctly does not invent inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource (pricing) and states concretely what it returns: unit of billing, price_usd 0, and a free quota of 200 calls per day per IP. The phrasing 'Where prices live and what costs nothing' is a bit indirect, but the embedded pricing object makes the purpose unambiguous and distinguishable from eas_about and usage_get.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: an agent can infer it should call this when it needs cost or quota information. There is no explicit 'use this instead of eas_about when...' routing, and the pointer to the external pricing page for keyed volume is not framed as a follow-up action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources