Skip to main content
Glama

list_tester_offers

Read-only

Browse the catalogue of tests a real person will run on a real device: mobile UX on a handset, end-to-end checkout, a screen-reader pass by somebody who uses one daily, native-speaker translation review, and more. These cover what reading a page cannot answer — how something feels on a handset, what a screen reader announces, whether a checkout completes on a real phone: what an automated audit cannot measure. Returns each offer with its price in credits, turnaround, and exactly what gets delivered. Cost: free — reads data your organisation already produced. Rate limit: 100 requests/minute per API key.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_tester_offers"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/destructive/openWorld annotations, it discloses the billing model ('free — reads data your organisation already produced'), a concrete rate limit (100 requests/minute per API key), and what comes back in each offer. Useful added context, though it does not say whether the catalogue is paginated or how large it typically is.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded and cost/rate-limit info lands last, which is good, but the middle repeats the same evidence twice ('mobile UX on a handset… screen-reader pass… end-to-end checkout' then 'how something feels on a handset, what a screen reader announces, whether a checkout completes on a real phone'). That duplication could be cut without losing selection signal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters, no output schema and safe-read annotations, the description still covers purpose, cost, rate limit, and the shape of the return payload (price in credits, turnaround, deliverables). Nothing an agent needs in order to call it is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is nothing for the description to explain or omit.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Browse the catalogue of tests a real person will run') and enumerates what the catalogue contains, so an agent can distinguish it from hire_tester or the automated-audit siblings without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied rather than stated: 'Cost: free — reads data your organisation already produced' hints this is a cheap discovery call before hire_tester, but neither the alternative tool nor the condition for choosing it is named. No explicit when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.