Given a household situation, return the application / recertification / reporting deadlines for the benefits the person likely qualifies for — each with its CFR/statute cite and administering body. The reminder annuity's data spine.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| householdSize | Yes | ||
| householdIncome | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It describes the output but does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, data freshness, latency, or side effects. The description assumes a safe read operation but does not confirm it.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The main sentence is concise and front-loaded with the core purpose. However, the cryptic phrase 'The reminder annuity's data spine' is confusing and adds no value, slightly detracting from clarity. Overall, it is mostly efficient with minor excess.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with two numeric inputs and no output schema, the description explains inputs and output format (deadlines with cites and administering body). However, it lacks details such as which benefits are considered, how many deadlines are returned, or whether results are ordered. It is adequate but not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It vaguely references 'household situation' but does not explain the exact meaning of 'householdIncome' (e.g., annual/monthly, gross/net) or 'householdSize' (number of people). The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly specifies the tool's purpose: given a household situation, it returns application/recertification/reporting deadlines with CFR/statute cites and administering body. The verb 'return' and resource 'deadlines' are explicit, and the scope is distinct from sibling tools like 'qualify_check' (which likely checks eligibility, not deadlines).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description states the input condition ('Given a household situation') but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. Usage context is implied by the description but lacks exclusions or comparisons with siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct domain (benefits, citizenship, charity care, employer benefits, etc.) with clear descriptions that prevent overlap. The only potential confusion between grail_value and grail_appraise is resolved by their free vs. premium distinction.
All tools use snake_case with a consistent pattern of domain prefix followed by action (e.g., charity_care_check, missed_credits_scan). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
12 tools cover a broad range of benefit/grant/visa/citizenship checkers without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear, non-overlapping purpose, earning its place.
The server covers major categories of financial assistance (federal/state benefits, tax credits, R&D grants, charity care, employer benefits, down payment assistance) plus citizenship and visas. While specialized areas may be missing, the surface is comprehensive for a grant-finder.