Skip to main content
Glama

Get instructions for DPF account signup, email verification, or password reset

manage_account
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns instructions for creating a DPF account, verifying its email, resending the verification code, or resetting a forgotten password — it never performs these itself and never asks for a password. A password typed into this chat would sit in the conversation transcript, so every action instead returns the DPF website's own form, or a curl command that reads the password from a shell variable the user sets themselves in their own terminal. Hand the command to the user to run — do not run it yourself even if you have shell access, since composing the export line would require seeing the password. action "register": requires email, firstName, lastName, and termsAccepted: true (only after the user has explicitly agreed to the DPF Terms of Service and Privacy Policy in this conversation). action "verify": confirm the 6-digit code DPF emailed after registration (requires otp). action "resend": re-send that code if it never arrived. action "forgot-password": request a password-reset code (requires email). action "reset-password": submit that code and set a new password (requires otp).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
otpNoaction "verify" and "reset-password" only. The 6-digit code from the email DPF sent.
emailYes
actionYes
lastNameNoaction "register" only
firstNameNoaction "register" only
termsAcceptedNoaction "register" only. Must be true.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "register",
      -  "verify",
      -  "resend"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "register",
      +  "verify",
      +  "resend",
      +  "forgot-password",
      +  "reset-password"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / otp / description
      Previous value: -"action \"verify\" only. The 6-digit code from the verification email."New value: +"action \"verify\" and \"reset-password\" only. The 6-digit code from the email DPF sent."
    • removedInput schema / properties / password
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "action \"register\" only",
      -  "minLength": 8,
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint: true and idempotentHint: true. The description adds substantial context: it never performs actions, never asks for a password, and emphasizes the risk of password transcripts. This aligns with annotations and enriches behavioral understanding beyond structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is lengthy but each section adds necessary detail for safe usage. The action list is well-structured. While slightly verbose, it avoids redundancy and front-loads the critical safety information about password handling.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 parameters, 5 actions) and absence of an output schema, the description fully documents behavior, parameter constraints, and safety considerations. It provides complete guidance for an agent to correctly invoke the tool without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67%, but the description explains each action's parameter requirements in detail (e.g., 'verify' requires otp, 'register' requires firstName, lastName, termsAccepted, and that termsAccepted must be true only after explicit consent). This goes beyond schema descriptions and clarifies conditional usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'Returns instructions' for specific account actions (signup, verify, resend, forgot-password, reset-password) and explicitly contrasts with performing actions itself. It distinguishes itself from siblings by focusing solely on account management instructions, which is unique among the listed tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs when to use the tool (handing commands to the user) and when not to (do not run commands even with shell access, due to password exposure). Per-action usage requirements are detailed, such as requiring termsAccepted only after explicit user agreement, and verifying OTP formats.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources