Skip to main content
Glama

List Projects

project_list
Read-only

List projects in the workspace. Filter by status: active (default), done, archived, or all. Returns up to limit projects; hasMore is true when more matched than were returned.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax results; the response's `hasMore` reports truncation
cursorNoOpaque pagination cursor from a previous call's `nextCursor`. Pass it with the same filters to fetch the next page.
statusNoFilter by project statusactive
contextYesExplain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): "Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization."
workspaceNoWorkspace id, slug, or name

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countYes
totalYes
hasMoreYesTrue when more results matched than were returned
projectsYes
nextCursorYes

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds useful behavioral details beyond annotations: the default status of 'active', the fact that results are capped at `limit`, and that `hasMore` signals truncation. This is meaningful transparency for pagination behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler. The core action and scope are front-loaded, the filter options are condensed into a clear list, and pagination behavior is stated efficiently. Every sentence contributes useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, full schema coverage, output schema presence, and annotations covering safety, the description is complete. It covers what the tool lists, how filtering works, the default status, and pagination/truncation behavior. The schema handles the remaining parameter details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents `limit`, `cursor`, `status`, `context`, and `workspace` in detail. The description repeats the status enum and adds the `hasMore` truncation concept, but this adds limited value beyond the schema. At high schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description begins with a specific verb and resource: 'List projects in the workspace.' It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like project_add, project_edit, task_list, and team_list. It also adds key filtering semantics with status values and pagination, so there is no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description makes the tool's purpose and scope clear: list projects in the workspace with an optional status filter. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when not to use them, but the distinction from task_list and search is reasonably implied by naming the resource and filtering options. Slight deduction for not stating exclusions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are grouped cleanly by resource (task, checklist, comment, label, project, attachment), so most actions have an obvious owner. The main ambiguities are task_list vs. search and checklist_done vs. checklist_edit, but the descriptions call out the intended boundaries clearly enough to avoid frequent misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The dominant resource_verb pattern (task_add, task_edit, checklist_list, comment_remove, project_join) is consistent and predictable. A few outliers like get_context, guide, search, and task_attachment_list break the pattern, but the naming remains readable and mostly uniform.

Tool Count2/5

At 35 tools, this is a very large surface for an agent to choose from and exceeds the 25-tool threshold where count becomes a liability. The tools are well organized, but the repeated verb families across six resources make the total feel heavy even though each tool is plausibly justified.

Completeness4/5

The core task lifecycle is well covered: create, show, edit, list, complete, reopen, archive, assign, and bulk operations, plus full checklist, comment, label, and attachment workflows. Notable gaps are the lack of an explicit unarchive/restore path and no label edit/delete, but these are minor enough that agents can usually work around them.

Resources