Skip to main content
Glama

Reopen Task

task_reopen
Idempotent

Reopen a completed task, or several at once with tasks (max 50). Each returns to its previous view.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
taskNoWorkspace-scoped task number, encoded as a string
tasksNoSeveral workspace-scoped task numbers (max 50), instead of `task`. Confirm the list with the user first: one call changes every task in it.
contextYesExplain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): "Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization."
workspaceNoWorkspace id, slug, or name. Required when the account has more than one workspace: a call without it then fails and names the choices

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
countYes
tasksYesEvery task the call changed, in the order it was given
actionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / workspace / description
      Previous value: -"Workspace id, slug, or name"New value: +"Workspace id, slug, or name. Required when the account has more than one workspace: a call without it then fails and names the choices"
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / tasks
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Several workspace-scoped task numbers (max 50), instead of `task`. Confirm the list with the user first: one call changes every task in it.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "description": "Workspace-scoped task number, encoded as a string",
      +    "pattern": "^[1-9]\\d*$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 50,
      +  "minItems": 1,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "task",
      -  "context"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "context"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / count
      Added value: +{
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / id
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / number
      Removed value: -{
      -  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      -  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      -  "type": "integer"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / tasks
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Every task the call changed, in the order it was given",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "number": {
      +        "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      +        "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "id",
      +      "number",
      +      "title"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "action",
      -  "id",
      -  "number",
      -  "ok"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "action",
      +  "count",
      +  "ok",
      +  "tasks"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and readOnlyHint=false, so safety is partly covered. The description adds real behavioral context beyond that: reopening restores the task to its previous view (prior status, not a generic default) and caps the batch at 50.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences, front-loaded with the action and the bulk-mode switch, with no filler. Every clause carries information an agent needs before calling.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation, and single/batch behavior and limits are covered. Minor gap: it says 'completed task' but does not clarify whether archived tasks can be reopened, which matters given the task_archive sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains `task`, `tasks`, `context` and `workspace` fully. The description only echoes the `tasks` max-50 constraint and the confirm-with-user warning that the schema already contains, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (reopen) and resource (task), plus the batch variant via `tasks` with a cap. An agent can distinguish this from task_done/task_archive/task_edit because the description makes clear it reverses completion and restores the prior state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Condition for use is implicit but clear: the task must be completed, and the `tasks` parameter is named as the bulk alternative. No explicit when-not guidance or naming of competing siblings such as task_edit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources