Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

dialogbrain

by com.dialogbrain
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

browser_attach_meet

Read-onlyIdempotent

Attach to THIS meet's bot browser and return a page_id for its live Google Meet tab. Then use the normal browser.* tools (browser.snapshot to see the page, browser.click to press a control, browser.take_screenshot, browser.evaluate, browser.console_messages, browser.network_requests) with that page_id to inspect why the bot isn't visibly joining (lobby/blocked/admitted) and to recover a stalled join. Call with no arguments from inside a meet.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "browser_attach_meet"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
in_workspaceNoRun this one call in this workspace id instead of the session's. Nothing is stored; other sessions are not affected.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / in_workspace
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Run this one call in this workspace id instead of the session's. Nothing is stored; other sessions are not affected.",
+  "type": "integer"
+}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful behavioral context beyond that: it attaches to a specific live tab, hands back a page_id, and enables a follow-up inspection/recovery workflow. It does not state whether the page_id expires or whether attaching is exclusive, which keeps it out of the top band.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with the core action and return value. The parenthetical tool list is dense but each item signals a concrete capability; slightly more enumeration than strictly necessary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, and the description compensates by stating the return value (page_id) and how to use it. For a single-optional-param, read-only attach tool this is close to complete, missing only page_id lifetime/exclusivity details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the single optional in_workspace param is fully documented in the schema and the baseline is 3. The description's 'call with no arguments' framing is consistent with that param being optional and adds no syntax beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (attach) and resource (THIS meet's bot browser) and declares the return value (page_id for the live Google Meet tab). It is clearly distinguished from the normal browser.* siblings, which it names as downstream tools rather than alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the triggering condition (to inspect why the bot isn't visibly joining: lobby/blocked/admitted, or to recover a stalled join) and the prerequisite (call with no arguments from inside a meet). It does not name a competing tool it should be preferred over, but the when-to-use context is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All dialogbrain toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources