Skip to main content
Glama

getDexPools

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the pools belonging to one specific DEX on one network, e.g. all Uniswap v3 pools on ethereum, returned under 'results' with has_next_page and next_cursor. Read-only and keyless. Proxies /networks/{network}/pools/search with a dex_name filter; the old /networks/{network}/dexes/{dex}/pools endpoint was removed, so the 24h volume field is now volume_usd_24h and there is no page_info. Narrower than getNetworkPools (a single exchange, not the whole chain). Use for 'show me Raydium pools', 'top pairs on PancakeSwap', or 'liquidity on Orca'. Get the dex id from getNetworkDexes or search first, and pass that response's dex_id field ('uniswap_v3'), matched case-insensitively. Do not pass its dex_name field ('Uniswap V3'): a human display name returns HTTP 200 with an empty results[] rather than an error, so an empty answer here usually means the wrong form of the name was sent. Params: network (required slug); dex (required id, e.g. 'uniswap_v3'; the REST API calls this query parameter dex_name); limit (default 10, max 100); cursor (pass the previous next_cursor to page); sort_by (default 'volume_usd_24h', canonical *_24h fields, short legacy names still accepted, alias order_by); sort_dir 'asc'/'desc' (default 'desc', alias sort). The old page number is superseded: page 2 and above return an error pointing at cursor.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dexYesREQUIRED: the dex_id field from getNetworkDexes (e.g., 'uniswap_v3'), matched case-insensitively. Do not pass that response's dex_name field, the human display name (e.g., 'Uniswap V3'): it returns an empty results[] instead of an error, so a wrong value looks like a real but empty answer. The REST API calls this parameter dex_name.
pageNoSUPERSEDED: the replacement endpoint is cursor-paginated and ignores page. page=1 (or 0) still returns the first page as before; page=2 or above returns an error telling you to use cursor.
sortNoOPTIONAL: alias of sort_dir; both are accepted. Not deprecated at the REST layer: api.dexpaprika.com itself takes sort, so use this name when calling the REST API directly.
limitNoOPTIONAL: Number of items per page (default: 10, max: 100)
cursorNoOPTIONAL: Pagination cursor. Pass `next_cursor` from a previous response to fetch the next page (read `has_next_page` to know if more remain). Replaces the old page number.
networkYesREQUIRED: Network ID from getNetworks (e.g., 'ethereum', 'solana')
sort_byNoOPTIONAL: Sort field. Canonical parameter name. Defaults to 'volume_usd_24h'. Prefer the canonical *_24h names; short legacy names (volume_usd, transactions, last_price_change_usd_24h) are still accepted and normalized. The REST API calls this parameter order_by.
order_byNoOPTIONAL: alias of sort_by; both are accepted. Not deprecated at the REST layer: api.dexpaprika.com itself takes order_by, so use this name when calling the REST API directly.
sort_dirNoOPTIONAL: Sort direction (asc/desc). Canonical parameter name. Defaults to 'desc' if neither sort_dir nor sort is provided. The REST API calls this parameter sort.
rationaleYesREQUIRED. 1-2 sentence rationale for this call (e.g. "User asked for X; calling Y to fetch Z"). Logged for MCP improvement, never shown to end users. No PII or secrets. See the server `instructions` field for the full convention and worked examples.

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, but the description adds valuable behavioral context: the tool is keyless, proxies a search endpoint, the old endpoint was removed, field naming changed (volume_usd_24h), the page parameter is superseded by cursor, and wrong dex_name returns empty results rather than an error. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but dense and well-structured, front-loaded with purpose and then covering use cases, pitfalls, and parameter notes. Each sentence contributes either differentiation, usage guidance, or parameter semantics, though some parameter details duplicate schema info. It's appropriately sized for a 10-param tool with no output schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains the return shape ('results' with has_next_page and next_cursor), pagination mechanism, and notable field changes. It covers required and optional params and aliases, making it sufficient for an agent to call correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds critical semantics beyond the schema: the dex parameter must be the dex_id (not human dex_name), aliases for sort_by/sort_dir, legacy sort field names, and cursor pagination replacement for page. These clarifications prevent common misuse.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets pools for one DEX on one network, provides a concrete example (Uniswap v3 on ethereum), and differentiates it from getNetworkPools by noting it's narrower. This satisfies both verb+resource and sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says when to use it ('show me Raydium pools', 'top pairs on PancakeSwap') and distinguishes from getNetworkPools as narrower. It also instructs to get the dex id from getNetworkDexes first, giving clear context and prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: network listings, DEX listings, pool discovery, pool snapshots, OHLCV, transactions, token details, multi-price, token pools, search, stats, and feedback. Potential overlaps like getTopTokens vs filterNetworkTokens are explicitly disambiguated in descriptions.

Naming Consistency4/5

Mostly follows camelCase verb-first pattern (getNetworks, getPoolDetails, getTokenMultiPrices). However, the pair filterNetworkTokens and getNetworkPoolsFilter are inconsistently structured; the latter should logically be filterNetworkPools for full consistency.

Tool Count4/5

At 17 tools, it slightly exceeds the ideal 3-15 range, but each tool covers a distinct data operation for a comprehensive DEX-market API. The count feels justified given the breadth of features, though it is on the heavier side.

Completeness4/5

The domain of read-only DEX analytics is well covered: networks, DEXes, pools, tokens, search, stats, and per-pool history. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct token price history endpoint, but pool OHLCV and token details cover most needs.

Resources