x402_sample_scrub
Free sample data-scrub / leak-guard teaser (dirty→clean demo). Alt path — primary convert is x402_sample_outline → outline 0.01.
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Money-Engine x402 Research
TDQS
C2.3/5.0
Behavior2/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description labels it a 'demo' but does not disclose behavioral traits like whether it mutates data, requires permissions, or has side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness3/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Short two sentences, but first sentence is vague and the second sentence introduces an alternative path without clear structure. Could be more front-loaded with a clear purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness2/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, description is incomplete for an agent; does not explain what 'dirty→clean demo' means, what the output is, or how to interpret results.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters so schema coverage is 100%; baseline is 3. Description adds no parameter meaning but does not need to; the schema already fully defines inputs.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose2/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description says 'data-scrub / leak-guard teaser' but purpose is vague; mentions an alternative path to x402_sample_outline without clarifying what this tool does. Lacks a specific verb and resource.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines2/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The alternative path hint is unclear and does not provide usage context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool has a distinct primary purpose (discovery, health, free sample, paid outline, paid brief, alternative scrub), but the conversion ladder is mentioned in multiple tools, which could cause slight confusion for an agent about which free tool leads where.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools consistently use the 'x402_' prefix followed by a descriptive compound noun (e.g., discovery, health, research_brief, sample_outline), creating a predictable and clear naming pattern.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a research API with a free-to-paid conversion ladder, covering all necessary stages without superfluous or missing tools.
Completeness4/5
The tools cover the complete research generation flow (discovery, health check, free sample, paid outline, paid brief), with an alternative scrub demo. A minor gap is the absence of a history or status tool for previously generated research.