Skip to main content
Glama

Dayze — Life Context

Update Current Location

update_current_location

MUTATES where the user is now: profiles.location + polaris current_city/country (same as in-app Dayze chat). Pass location ("The Madeira, Singapore") and/or city+country; optional place/venue + lat/lon records a fresh location_visits check-in so get_location_context returns is_current. set_home defaults true; check_in defaults true when place or coordinates are set. Does not invent GPS when omitted. ($0.10; API key required)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityNo
placeNoVenue / residence name (e.g. The Madeira)
venueNoAlias for place
addressNo
countryNo
check_inNoWrite a location_visits row when place or coordinates are set (default true in that case)
latitudeNo
locationNoFreeform “City, Country” or “Venue, City, Country”
set_homeNoAlso write profiles.location / home_location (default true)
longitudeNo
request_idNo
idempotency_keyNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
placeNo
accountNoThe Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.
contextNoFresh get_location_context after write.
messageNo
updatedNo
check_inNo
locationNo
set_homeNo
visit_idNo
provenanceNoWhich connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.
current_cityNo
current_countryNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "display_name": {
      +      "description": "Account display name.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "handle": {
      +      "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "qa_fixture": {
      +      "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "handle",
      +    "display_name",
      +    "qa_fixture",
      +    "note"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "account": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "display_name": {
      +          "description": "Account display name.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "handle": {
      +          "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "qa_fixture": {
      +          "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "handle",
      +        "display_name",
      +        "qa_fixture",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "channel": {
      +      "description": "Always mcp_connector.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "connector": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "kind": {
      +          "description": "oauth or api_key.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "description": "The connected app or API-key label shown to the account owner.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "kind",
      +        "name"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "chatgpt for ChatGPT OAuth writes; mcp for another OAuth app or API key.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "source",
      +    "channel",
      +    "connector",
      +    "account"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint=false correctly signals a write), the description discloses concrete side effects: writing profiles.location, polaris city/country, and a location_visits check-in; default values for set_home and check_in; that no GPS is invented when omitted; plus cost ($0.10) and API-key auth requirement. This is rich, actionable behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The critical fact (MUTATES current location) is front-loaded, and there is little filler. It is dense to the point of being run-on with stacked parentheticals, but every clause carries information about defaults, side effects, or cost.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be described, and the annotations cover the safety profile. The description fills the remaining gaps (defaults, check-in behavior, cost, auth) adequately for a 12-parameter mutation tool, though the undocumented auxiliary params leave a small gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 42% schema coverage across 12 params, the description compensates well: it explains the location format with an example, the place/venue alias, the interaction between place/coordinates and check_in, and the set_home default. It leaves address, request_id, and idempotency_key implicit, but the key decision-driving parameters are covered.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource ("MUTATES where the user is now") and names the exact fields touched (profiles.location, polaris current_city/country, location_visits). It distinguishes itself from the read sibling get_location_context and the historical log_place_visit, so an agent can identify it without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear context (mirrors in-app Dayze chat; updates current location) and describes parameter combinations, but never states when to choose this tool over alternatives such as log_place_visit or log_movement. Usage is implied rather than routed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.