Dayze — Life Context

Restore Change

restore_change

Undo a reviewed destructive change by restore_id within 30 days: deleted rows come back with their links, archived or overwritten fields revert, and inserted history rows are removed. Refuses if the record was edited since; repeats are no-ops. Call-time aliases: restore_food, restore_place, restore_inventory_item, restore_asset, restore_tracker, restore_memory. Contact deletes/merges use undo_contact_change; event/expense/trip archives use restore_event/restore_expense/restore_trip. ($0.10; API key required)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`request_id`	No	Optional idempotency key.
`restore_id`	Yes	restore_id returned by the destructive tool.
`idempotency_key`	No	Alias for request_id.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`tool`	No
`undone`	No
`account`	No	The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.
`message`	No
`restored`	No
`provenance`	No	Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.
`restore_id`	No
`linked_rows_skipped`	No
`operations_reverted`	No
`linked_rows_relinked`	No
`linked_rows_reinserted`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedOct 3, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / account

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
+  "properties": {
+    "display_name": {
+      "description": "Account display name.",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "handle": {
+      "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "qa_fixture": {
+      "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "handle",
+    "display_name",
+    "qa_fixture",
+    "note"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / provenance

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "description": "Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.",
+  "properties": {
+    "account": {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
+      "properties": {
+        "display_name": {
+          "description": "Account display name.",
+          "type": [
+            "string",
+            "null"
+          ]
+        },
+        "handle": {
+          "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
+          "type": [
+            "string",
+            "null"
+          ]
+        },
+        "note": {
+          "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "qa_fixture": {
+          "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "handle",
+        "display_name",
+        "qa_fixture",
+        "note"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "channel": {
+      "description": "Always mcp_connector.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "connector": {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "kind": {
+          "description": "oauth or api_key.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "name": {
+          "description": "The connected app or API-key label shown to the account owner.",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "kind",
+        "name"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "chatgpt for ChatGPT OAuth writes; mcp for another OAuth app or API key.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "source",
+    "channel",
+    "connector",
+    "account"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedSep 27, 2026

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are sparse (only readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false), and the description carries the real behavioral burden: 30-day limit, refusal on subsequent edits, idempotent repeats as no-ops, exact restoration semantics, plus cost ($0.10) and auth (API key required). This is far more than the annotations convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action and constraints, then aliases and routing. Dense with multiple clauses but each sentence carries routing, constraint, or behavioral value; the alias list is long yet useful for name resolution.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation. Given a 3-param mutation tool with siblings named restore_*, undo_*, and archive_* tools, the description supplies eligibility window, failure conditions, idempotency, alternatives, cost, and auth — everything needed to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning: it clarifies restore_id originates from the destructive tool and that repeats (tied to request_id/idempotency_key) are no-ops. It does not, however, explain the request_id vs idempotency_key alias relationship beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (undo/restore) and resource (a reviewed destructive change keyed by restore_id), and describes concretely what is restored: deleted rows with links, archived/overwritten fields, and removal of inserted history rows. It clearly distinguishes itself from siblings by naming the alternatives for other undo cases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: contact deletes/merges use undo_contact_change, event/expense/trip archives use restore_event/restore_expense/restore_trip. It also states the 30-day eligibility window and that it refuses if the record was edited since, so when-to-use and when-not-to-use are both covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Dayze — Life Context tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.