Skip to main content
Glama

Dayze — Life Context

Merge People Preview

merge_people_preview

Save a durable restore snapshot without modifying contacts before merge_people. Returns resulting name/aliases, preserved counts, field conflicts, safe_to_merge. ($0.05; API key required)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
request_idNoClient idempotency key (retries return original result).
field_choicesNo
idempotency_keyNoAlias for request_id.
primary_person_idYes
duplicate_person_idsYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
accountNoThe Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.
manifestNo
warningsNo
preview_idNo
provenanceNoWhich connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.
reversibleNo
safe_to_mergeYes
resulting_nameNo
field_conflictsNo
photos_preservedNo
primary_person_idYes
resulting_aliasesNo
restore_window_daysNo
graph_edges_preservedNo
interactions_preservedNo
transactions_preservedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "display_name": {
      +      "description": "Account display name.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "handle": {
      +      "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "qa_fixture": {
      +      "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "handle",
      +    "display_name",
      +    "qa_fixture",
      +    "note"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "account": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "display_name": {
      +          "description": "Account display name.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "handle": {
      +          "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "qa_fixture": {
      +          "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "handle",
      +        "display_name",
      +        "qa_fixture",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "channel": {
      +      "description": "Always mcp_connector.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "connector": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "kind": {
      +          "description": "oauth or api_key.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "description": "The connected app or API-key label shown to the account owner.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "kind",
      +        "name"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "chatgpt for ChatGPT OAuth writes; mcp for another OAuth app or API key.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "source",
      +    "channel",
      +    "connector",
      +    "account"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Alias for request_id.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / request_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Client idempotency key (retries return original result).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / manifest
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / preview_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / restore_window_days
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reversible
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations by disclosing the durable restore snapshot side effect, the return fields (name/aliases, preserved counts, field conflicts, safe_to_merge), a cost ($0.05), and an auth requirement (API key). The readOnlyHint=false is consistent with writing a snapshot while leaving contacts untouched.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly packed sentences that front-load the core behavior and side effect, with cost and auth appended compactly. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a preview/dry-run tool with an output schema present, the description covers purpose, side effects, and result shape adequately. The only real gap is parameter semantics, which the low-coverage schema leaves undocumented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 40%, and the description adds no meaning for primary_person_id, duplicate_person_ids, field_choices, or the idempotency keys. The listed items (name/aliases, preserved counts, conflicts) are return values, not parameters, so the coverage gap is uncompensated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Save a durable restore snapshot'), clarifies it is non-mutating ('without modifying contacts'), and explicitly names the sibling it precedes (merge_people). An agent can distinguish it from merge_people without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'before merge_people' clearly establishes when to call this tool and names the alternative, merge_people. It stops short of stating what to do with the result or when to skip the preview, but the primary usage context is explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.