Skip to main content
Glama

Dayze — Life Context

Log Income

log_income

Record money received (Stripe, refunds, payroll, Venmo). log_transaction with type income and direction from already set (pass neither). Use external_id for Stripe/Gmail idempotency. A contact paying back an IOU: category "IOU repayment" + person_id (lowers the IOU, shows the money once). A contact lending the user cash: category "IOU lend" + person_id (creates the IOU the user owes, shows the money once). ($0.10; API key required)

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateNo
tagsNoOptional tags. Prefer project: / ext: / rail: grammar.
notesNoFree text about the payment. Alias: description.
amountYes
sourceNo
projectNoVenture/project label → stored as project:{slug} tag (e.g. Max Soko poker venture)
categoryNoe.g. Salary, Gift, Refund. "IOU repayment" and "IOU lend" need person_id.
currencyNo
iou_typeNoloan (default) or invoice. Invoice = unpaid receivable: no Finance outflow on create; payment is income "Invoice payment". Use for invoice/receivable phrasings; "I lent…" → loan.
merchantNo
person_idNo
cash_movedNoWith category "IOU lend": true (default) = cash changed hands as a loan (shows in Finance); false = an owed share, e.g. of a dinner logged as its own expense (IOU only). Ignored for iou_type invoice.
request_idNoClient idempotency key (retries return original result).
descriptionNoAlias for notes.
external_idNo
person_nameNoThe contact by name, when there is no person_id (IOU categories need one or the other).
client_labelNoOptional free-text client label for an invoice IOU.
payment_methodNo
idempotency_keyNoAlias for request_id.
not_iou_repaymentNotrue only when income from a contact with an open IOU is unrelated to it.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNo
accountNoThe Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.
messageNo
event_idNo
directionNo
duplicateNo
expense_idNo
provenanceNoWhich connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.
inspect_urlNoThe Dayze page that shows the saved record.
transactionNoExpense/income transaction row.
inspect_noteNoWhat inspect_url opens. Never quote the record id.
transaction_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / inspect_note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "What inspect_url opens. Never quote the record id.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / inspect_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The Dayze page that shows the saved record.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "display_name": {
      +      "description": "Account display name.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "handle": {
      +      "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "qa_fixture": {
      +      "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "handle",
      +    "display_name",
      +    "qa_fixture",
      +    "note"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "account": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "display_name": {
      +          "description": "Account display name.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "handle": {
      +          "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "qa_fixture": {
      +          "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "handle",
      +        "display_name",
      +        "qa_fixture",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "channel": {
      +      "description": "Always mcp_connector.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "connector": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "kind": {
      +          "description": "oauth or api_key.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "description": "The connected app or API-key label shown to the account owner.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "kind",
      +        "name"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "chatgpt for ChatGPT OAuth writes; mcp for another OAuth app or API key.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "source",
      +    "channel",
      +    "connector",
      +    "account"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cash_moved / description
      Previous value: -"With category \"IOU lend\": true (default) = cash changed hands as a loan (shows in Finance); false = an owed share, e.g. of a dinner logged as its own expense (IOU only)."New value: +"With category \"IOU lend\": true (default) = cash changed hands as a loan (shows in Finance); false = an owed share, e.g. of a dinner logged as its own expense (IOU only). Ignored for iou_type invoice."
    • addedInput schema / properties / client_label
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional free-text client label for an invoice IOU.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / iou_type
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "loan (default) or invoice. Invoice = unpaid receivable: no Finance outflow on create; payment is income \"Invoice payment\". Use for invoice/receivable phrasings; \"I lent…\" → loan.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / description
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Alias for notes.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / notes / description
      Added value: +"Free text about the payment. Alias: description."
    • addedInput schema / properties / person_name
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The contact by name, when there is no person_id (IOU categories need one or the other).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / project
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Venture/project label → stored as project:{slug} tag (e.g. Max Soko poker venture)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / tags
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional tags. Prefer project: / ext: / rail: grammar.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cash_moved
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "With category \"IOU lend\": true (default) = cash changed hands as a loan (shows in Finance); false = an owed share, e.g. of a dinner logged as its own expense (IOU only).",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / category / description
      Previous value: -"e.g. Salary, Gift, Refund. \"IOU repayment\" needs person_id."New value: +"e.g. Salary, Gift, Refund. \"IOU repayment\" and \"IOU lend\" need person_id."
  6. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / category
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "e.g. Salary, Gift, Refund. \"IOU repayment\" needs person_id.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / not_iou_repayment
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "true only when income from a contact with an open IOU is unrelated to it.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  7. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / event_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
  8. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare write/non-destructive/closed-world. The description adds real behavioral context beyond that: the $0.10 cost, API key requirement, idempotency via external_id, and the side-effect semantics ('lowers the IOU, shows the money once' / 'creates the IOU the user owes') that determine downstream finance state. It does not describe failure modes or what happens on duplicate external_id beyond 'idempotent'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded purpose followed by the highest-risk decision rules; each sentence carries operational content. The parenthetical '($0.10; API key required)' and the log_transaction aside add length but also needed facts, so only mildly overstuffed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 20-parameter financial write with an output schema (so return values need no explanation), the description covers the highest-consequence logic: routing, idempotency, IOU side effects, and cost. It leaves several common fields unexplained, so it is strong but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 60% on 20 parameters, and the schema itself already documents the tricky fields (iou_type, cash_moved, not_iou_repayment, category). The description adds the cross-field dependency (IOU categories need person_id) and idempotency use of external_id, so it is at/just above the baseline, but many parameters (date, amount, currency, source, merchant, payment_method, person_id) are explained nowhere.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Record money received') and immediately gives concrete source examples (Stripe, refunds, payroll, Venmo), which separates it from log_expense and generic log_transaction. An agent can pick it out of a very dense sibling list without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit routing guidance (it is log_transaction with type income/direction preset), plus conditional rules for the two contact-IOU cases (repayment vs lend) keyed on category and person_id. It does not state when to prefer it over log_transaction generally or how it relates to log_expense/record_sale, so it stops short of full when/when-not coverage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.