Skip to main content
Glama

Dayze — Life Context

Convert Contact Entity

convert_contact_entity
Destructive

Preview first, 30-day undo. Convert a contact’s entity_type (same as classify_contact). Preserves FKs. Reviewed and reversible: first call preview_destructive_change({ tool: "convert_contact_entity", arguments: { person_id, target_type } }), which stores the exact change without applying it. After the user confirms, call convert_contact_entity with preview_id, restore_window_acknowledged: true and request_id; the reviewed preview is applied exactly and a changed record is refused. Returns restore_id; restore_change({ restore_id }) undoes it for 30 days unless the record was edited since. Restore reverts entity_type, identity_status and identity_confidence. ($0.10; API key required)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
entity_idNo
person_idNo
preview_idYespreview_id returned by preview_destructive_change for this tool.
request_idYesRequired idempotency key; retries return the original receipt.
target_typeNo
idempotency_keyNoAlias for request_id.
restore_window_acknowledgedYesMust be true after reviewing the preview and its 30-day restore window.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
personNo
accountNoThe Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.
messageNo
change_idNo
preview_idNo
provenanceNoWhich connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.
restore_idNoPass to restore_change to undo within restore_window_days.
reversibleNo
idempotent_replayNo
restore_expires_atNo
restore_window_daysNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "display_name": {
      +      "description": "Account display name.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "handle": {
      +      "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "qa_fixture": {
      +      "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "handle",
      +    "display_name",
      +    "qa_fixture",
      +    "note"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Which connector wrote the record and which connected Dayze account received it.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "account": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "The Dayze account this data belongs to. With more than one Dayze connection, name it in the answer.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "display_name": {
      +          "description": "Account display name.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "handle": {
      +          "description": "Account handle, e.g. @goh.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "note": {
      +          "description": "How to disclose the account to the user.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "qa_fixture": {
      +          "description": "True for a known QA test account: its records are fixture data, not a real life.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "handle",
      +        "display_name",
      +        "qa_fixture",
      +        "note"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "channel": {
      +      "description": "Always mcp_connector.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "connector": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "kind": {
      +          "description": "oauth or api_key.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "description": "The connected app or API-key label shown to the account owner.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "kind",
      +        "name"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "source": {
      +      "description": "chatgpt for ChatGPT OAuth writes; mcp for another OAuth app or API key.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "source",
      +    "channel",
      +    "connector",
      +    "account"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed10 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / preview_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "preview_id returned by preview_destructive_change for this tool.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / request_id / description
      Previous value: -"Client idempotency key (retries return original result)."New value: +"Required idempotency key; retries return the original receipt."
    • addedInput schema / properties / restore_window_acknowledged
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Must be true after reviewing the preview and its 30-day restore window.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "target_type"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "preview_id",
      +  "restore_window_acknowledged",
      +  "request_id"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / idempotent_replay
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / preview_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / restore_expires_at
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / restore_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Pass to restore_change to undo within restore_window_days.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / restore_window_days
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reversible
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well past the annotations (destructiveHint=true): discloses preview-first requirement, 30-day undo window, that a changed/changed record is refused, that FKs are preserved, and precisely what restore reverts (entity_type, identity_status, identity_confidence). This is unusually rich behavioral context for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the preview/undo model and cost, with each sentence carrying workflow or reversal information. It is dense and slightly repetitive in restating the preview/restore loop, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, the description needn't explain return values, and it still covers the full lifecycle (preview, apply, refuse-on-change, restore) plus pricing and auth. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 57%, so the description meaningfully supplements: it explains preview_id's provenance, request_id's idempotent-retry behavior, and the review semantics of restore_window_acknowledged. It could still clarify entity_id vs person_id and target_type's allowed values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Convert a contact's entity_type') and immediately identifies its relationship to a sibling ('same as classify_contact'), letting an agent distinguish it from the ~150 other tools. No ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit two-step protocol: first call preview_destructive_change with exact arguments, then after user confirmation call this tool with preview_id, restore_window_acknowledged: true and request_id. It also names classify_contact as the equivalent operation, so the when/how is fully prescribed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.