Skip to main content
Glama

Datailo: one MCP connection to tenders, EU regulation and law

Your account

datailo_account
Read-onlyIdempotent

The connected account's email, service links, and plan states. action='keys' lists your dat_ keys (prefix, origin, created, last used — never the key); action='revoke_key' with key_prefix revokes one.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionNo
sessionNoThe `session` value datailo_connect_verify returned. Pass it on every Datailo call in this conversation; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key.
key_prefixNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / action
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Action"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / key_prefix
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Key Prefix"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / session / description
      Previous value: -"The `session` value datailo_connect_verify returned, when this client keeps no connection session. Pass it on every Datailo call in this conversation; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key."New value: +"The `session` value datailo_connect_verify returned. Pass it on every Datailo call in this conversation; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / session
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "The `session` value datailo_connect_verify returned, when this client keeps no connection session. Pass it on every Datailo call in this conversation; omit it when the user connected with Sign in (OAuth) or a key.",
      +  "title": "Session"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, yet the description states 'action='revoke_key' ... revokes one,' which is a state-changing operation. This is a direct annotation contradiction, and the description cannot be trusted as written.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with no filler. The purpose is front-loaded, and the security-relevant note 'never the key' earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the action examples, the description omits output expectations, the irreversibility of key revocation, and any auth/session context beyond the schema. The annotation contradiction makes the behavioral context incomplete and potentially misleading for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33%, but the description compensates for the bare 'action' and 'key_prefix' parameters by showing exact usage ('action='keys'', 'revoke_key' with key_prefix). The 'session' parameter is already thoroughly described in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource (the connected account) and gives concrete actions: 'keys' lists dat_ keys and 'revoke_key' revokes one. It clearly conveys what the tool does, though it does not explicitly compare itself with sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains two action values but gives no guidance on when to prefer this tool over siblings such as datailo_connect or datailo_plan. No exclusions, prerequisites, or alternative routing are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources