Skip to main content
Glama

Business Agent OS

Daily routine

daily_routine
Read-onlyIdempotent

How the memory works, the daily habit, the full text of the /pickup, /wrap, /biz-status, /biz-review, /trace, /ingest, /lint and /new-client command files, and how to use them with Codex or Grok.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "daily_routine"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful behavioral context by enumerating the specific reference material returned (memory explanation, daily habit, full command files) and the Codex/Grok usage notes, though it omits format and size details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single sentence with no wasted words in terms of length, but it is a dense list with no clear front-loaded statement of purpose. It is less scannable than it could be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless read-only documentation tool with no output schema, the description covers the subject matter but never explicitly states that it returns that material or in what form. The agent must infer the return contract, which is a gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to explain parameter semantics, and the empty schema is consistent with that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description lists the contents ('how the memory works, the daily habit, the full text of ... command files') but never states an action verb or explicitly what the tool returns. An agent can infer it retrieves documentation, but the purpose remains vague and it does not clearly differentiate from siblings like house_rules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternatives are provided. The phrase 'how to use them with Codex or Grok' describes the content rather than when an agent should call this tool versus another.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.