Skip to main content
Glama

Get Event

get_event
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve one exact disaster event and explicitly requested relationships, affected places, native observations, or geometry. Use get_data to obtain the stable event_id first.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPer-section ceiling for relationships, affected places, observations, or geometry frames.
includeNoOptional companion layers. Omit for the lightweight event summary. Geometry is never returned implicitly.
pack_idYesRequired disaster pack_id that returned this event_id from get_data. The tool never searches other packs.
event_idYesExact stable event_id returned by a disaster-pack get_data row.
source_idYesRequired source_id from the same get_data result. Must identify one published event source in pack_id.
request_idNoOptional caller-supplied request id for tracing.
geometry_modeNocurrent returns the representative/current shape; timeline returns bounded progression frames where supported.current
relationship_depthNoBounded cross-hazard traversal depth when relationships is included.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
eventNo
reasonNo
pack_idNo
event_idNo
geometryNo
guidanceNo
includedNo
warningsNo
availableNo
next_stepNo
source_idNo
event_typeNo
next_stepsNo
provenanceNo
request_idNo
observationsNo
schema_classNo
clarificationNo
relationshipsNo
affected_placesNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / pack_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional disaster pack hint. Recommended when known to avoid probing unrelated event sources."New value: +"Required disaster pack_id that returned this event_id from get_data. The tool never searches other packs."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pack_id / minLength
      Added value: +1
    • addedInput schema / properties / source_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Required source_id from the same get_data result. Must identify one published event source in pack_id.",
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "event_id"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "pack_id",
      +  "source_id",
      +  "event_id"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this a safe, idempotent, closed-world read, so the safety burden is lifted. The description adds genuinely useful behavioral context on top: retrieval is limited to a single exact event and only the layers 'explicitly requested' are attached, reinforcing the opt-in nature of the include set.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler, and the core action is front-loaded before the prerequisite. Every clause carries information the agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description supplies the critical precondition (a stable event_id from get_data) and the opt-in layer model, leaving little an agent would need to know before calling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters like include, geometry_mode, relationship_depth and limit are already fully documented with defaults and bounds. The description restates the four include values but adds no format or interaction detail beyond the schema, making the baseline 3 correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb (Retrieve) plus a narrowly scoped resource ('one exact disaster event'), and it enumerates the optional companion layers. It also distinguishes itself from the sibling it depends on by naming get_data as the source of the event_id, so an agent can tell the two apart without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use get_data to obtain the stable event_id first' gives an explicit prerequisite and routes the agent to the correct sibling for the lookup step. It stops short of stating when NOT to use this tool (e.g. bulk/multi-event retrieval), so it is clear context rather than full when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.