CycleCalcs Astronomy

All planets at a glance

astro_planet_board

Read-onlyIdempotent

All eight planets in one call for a date and optional location: constellation, magnitude, apparent size, elongation from the Sun, morning or evening sky, retrograde state with the next station, rise/set, and a worth-looking-tonight assessment. The right tool for "which planets are visible tonight". For exact coordinates of specific bodies use astro_positions.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`tz`	No	IANA timezone like "Europe/Lisbon" to render event times in local time. Optional; a resolved place supplies its own timezone.
`lat`	No	Latitude in decimal degrees, north positive. Send lat and lon together.
`lon`	No	Longitude in decimal degrees, east positive (Lisbon is about -9.14). Send lat and lon together.
`date`	No	ISO 8601 UTC date or datetime, e.g. "2026-08-06" or "2026-08-06T21:00:00Z". With a location, a bare date means that date there: its day, its evening and its night. Or jd: followed by a Julian Day on the UT scale, e.g. "jd:2461000.5". On astro_positions, date may list up to 24 datetimes separated by commas, answered in the order sent. Omit for the current moment. Years 1700 to 2200 only; outside that range the API refuses with DATE_OUT_OF_RANGE because the ephemeris is not reliable there.
`sort`	No	Optional result ordering. Default is by distance from the Sun.
`place`	No	The place NAME only, one to three words, instead of lat/lon: "City" or "City,CC" with an ISO country code, e.g. "Lisbon,PT". Never a question or a sentence. Resolved server-side; the response then carries a required GeoNames CC BY 4.0 credit in its attribution field, which must be preserved when shown.
`bodies`	No	Optional subset of planets: mercury, venus, mars, jupiter, saturn, uranus, neptune, pluto.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`data`	Yes	Which planets are worth looking at right now, and where.
`rights`	No	Either unrestricted, or attribution_required when third-party place data was used. When attribution_required, the attribution line must be shown.
`warnings`	No	Machine-readable notices about this answer. Present only when non-empty. Never changes whether the call succeeded.
`attribution`	No	The credit line to display verbatim when rights is attribution_required.
`next_cursor`	No	Present only when more rows exist. Send it back with the SAME start/end arguments as the first call to get the next page.
`not_computed`	No	Data this API deliberately does not serve, and why. Present only when the question touched such a field. An absence named here is information: treat it as "withheld", never as "none exists".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 23, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / place / description

Previous value: -"Place name instead of lat/lon, as \"City\" or \"City,CC\" with an ISO country code, e.g. \"Lisbon,PT\". Resolved server-side; the response then carries a required GeoNames CC BY 4.0 credit in its attribution field, which must be preserved when shown."New value: +"The place NAME only, one to three words, instead of lat/lon: \"City\" or \"City,CC\" with an ISO country code, e.g. \"Lisbon,PT\". Never a question or a sentence. Resolved server-side; the response then carries a required GeoNames CC BY 4.0 credit in its attribution field, which must be preserved when shown."

Changed1 schema field changedOct 23, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / date / description

Previous value: -"ISO 8601 UTC date or datetime, e.g. \"2026-08-06\" or \"2026-08-06T21:00:00Z\". Or jd: followed by a Julian Day on the UT scale, e.g. \"jd:2461000.5\". On astro_positions, date may list up to 24 datetimes separated by commas, answered in the order sent. Omit for the current moment. Years 1700 to 2200 only; outside that range the API refuses with DATE_OUT_OF_RANGE because the ephemeris is not reliable there."New value: +"ISO 8601 UTC date or datetime, e.g. \"2026-08-06\" or \"2026-08-06T21:00:00Z\". With a location, a bare date means that date there: its day, its evening and its night. Or jd: followed by a Julian Day on the UT scale, e.g. \"jd:2461000.5\". On astro_positions, date may list up to 24 datetimes separated by commas, answered in the order sent. Omit for the current moment. Years 1700 to 2200 only; outside that range the API refuses with DATE_OUT_OF_RANGE because the ephemeris is not reliable there."

Changed1 schema field changedSep 27, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / date / description

Previous value: -"ISO 8601 UTC date or datetime, e.g. \"2026-08-06\" or \"2026-08-06T21:00:00Z\". Omit for the current moment. Years 1700 to 2200 only; outside that range the API refuses with DATE_OUT_OF_RANGE because the ephemeris is not reliable there."New value: +"ISO 8601 UTC date or datetime, e.g. \"2026-08-06\" or \"2026-08-06T21:00:00Z\". Or jd: followed by a Julian Day on the UT scale, e.g. \"jd:2461000.5\". On astro_positions, date may list up to 24 datetimes separated by commas, answered in the order sent. Omit for the current moment. Years 1700 to 2200 only; outside that range the API refuses with DATE_OUT_OF_RANGE because the ephemeris is not reliable there."

Changed1 schema field changedAug 9, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "The MCP projection of a CycleCalcs v2 response: the answer, plus the provenance a caller needs to use it honestly.",
+  "properties": {
+    "attribution": {
+      "description": "The credit line to display verbatim when rights is attribution_required.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "data": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "description": "Which planets are worth looking at right now, and where.",
+      "properties": {
+        "above_horizon_now": {
+          "description": "Bodies above the horizon, visible or not.",
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "bodies": {
+          "description": "Every body with position, brightness and a visibility verdict.",
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "count": {
+          "description": "How many bodies are on the board.",
+          "type": "integer"
+        },
+        "instant": {
+          "description": "The moment evaluated.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "observable_now": {
+          "description": "Bodies both up and realistically visible.",
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "retrograde_now": {
+          "description": "Bodies currently in apparent retrograde motion.",
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "summary": {
+          "description": "A one-line reading of tonight's planets.",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "next_cursor": {
+      "description": "Present only when more rows exist. Send it back with the SAME start/end arguments as the first call to get the next page.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "not_computed": {
+      "description": "Data this API deliberately does not serve, and why. Present only when the question touched such a field. An absence named here is information: treat it as \"withheld\", never as \"none exists\".",
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "rights": {
+      "description": "Either unrestricted, or attribution_required when third-party place data was used. When attribution_required, the attribution line must be shown.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "warnings": {
+      "description": "Machine-readable notices about this answer. Present only when non-empty. Never changes whether the call succeeded.",
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "data"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedAug 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value by disclosing the breadth of evaluation performed server-side (visibility judgement, retrograde station) that the agent would otherwise have to assume. It does not mention the GeoNames attribution constraint, but the schema already carries that, so this is a minor gap rather than a contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Roughly three sentences, front-loaded with the payload contents before the routing rule. Every clause carries selection value: the field list makes the tool's richness apparent, and the sibling reference prevents misfires.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Zero required parameters, a fully described schema and an output schema mean the description only has to sell the tool's purpose and routing, which it does decisively. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and every parameter (tz, lat/lon pairing, date formats and year bounds, sort enum, place format, bodies subset) is fully documented in the schema itself. The description adds no parameter-level guidance such as default location behaviour when neither place nor lat/lon is sent, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (all eight planets) in one call and enumerates exactly what each entry contains: constellation, magnitude, size, elongation, morning/evening, retrograde with next station, rise/set, and a visibility assessment. It explicitly contrasts with astro_positions for precise coordinates of individual bodies, so an agent can distinguish it from siblings without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a concrete selection rule: "The right tool for 'which planets are visible tonight'" plus an explicit alternative ("For exact coordinates of specific bodies use astro_positions"). Both the when-to-use and the when-to-use-something-else are stated outright.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All CycleCalcs Astronomy tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?