List Supported Currencies
list_supported_currenciesList all supported currency pairs available for Guard pricing: GBPUSD, GBPEUR, and EURUSD.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_supported_currenciesList all supported currency pairs available for Guard pricing: GBPUSD, GBPEUR, and EURUSD.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -falseDoes the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the description adds concrete return values. It does not contradict annotations and provides useful context beyond structured data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with action and result. Perfectly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless listing tool with rich annotations, the description fully explains what the tool returns and is complete given the low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the description is not required to add parameter information. The tool is self-explanatory with zero input.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a clear verb ('list') and specifies the exact set of currency pairs, distinguishing it from sibling tools that deal with rates, pricing, and explanations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implicitly guides the agent to use this tool to discover supported currency pairs before querying rates, but does not explicitly state when to use alternatives or provide exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct purpose: explanation, rate queries (spot, forward, historic), supported currencies, pricing, extension pricing, and date resolution. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., explain_guard_product, get_forward_rate). Verbs are descriptive and uniform.
8 tools cover the core functionality of pricing and explaining a currency hedging product without being excessive or insufficient. Each tool serves a clear purpose.
The tool set covers explanation, rate information (spot, forward, historic), supported currencies, initial pricing, extension pricing, and date resolution – a complete workflow for quoting and understanding the Guard product.