Is this CSS feature safe to ship, and who ships it
css_featureAnswers two questions about a modern CSS feature with data instead of recall. First, its Baseline status (widely available, newly available, or limited availability), the date, and which core browsers lack it, read from the open web-features dataset at build time. Second, how many of CSS Crème's curated, decoded showcase sites ship it, which ones, how many of them guard it with @supports, and the exact @supports conditions they test. Also returns a fallback note where we have one, any name the feature has shipped under before (an agent that learned the old name will otherwise write it), and the documented limits that catch people out, each cited to the page it was read on. Call it before writing CSS that uses container queries, :has(), anchor positioning, @scope, view transitions, oklch(), color-mix(), light-dark(), subgrid, scroll-driven animations, @property, text-wrap and similar, so the CSS you write is accurate for today rather than for your training date. With no feature given it returns the Ship Gap: features that are safe and mostly ignored, and features that are early and shipped anyway.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| feature | No | A web-features id or a plain name: "container-queries", "has", ":has()", "anchor positioning", "oklch", "subgrid", "@scope". Omit for the whole Ship Gap summary. |