Skip to main content
Glama

CSIDIA — operational notes and capabilities

by com.csidia

CSIDIA group services and profile

capabilities

Profilo del gruppo CSIDIA e catalogo dei servizi: chi siamo, posizionamento, capacità (cosa facciamo, risultati, settori, modelli di erogazione, pagina, articoli correlati), settori, vincoli e come iniziare. csidia = dati/AI/conformità, splidia = fibra ottica/reti/data center. / Profile of the CSIDIA group and its service catalogue: positioning, capabilities, sectors, delivery models, constraints and how to start.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteNoMarchio di cui restituire il profilo (default all) / brand to profile
detailNofalse (default) = una riga per capacità, risposta compatta; true = descrizione completa, risultati, domande tipiche e articoli correlati / false (default) = one line per capability; true = full detail
languageNoLingua dei testi (default it) / text language
capability_idNoDettaglio di una sola capacità, per id (es. 'conformita-documentale-assistita') / detail for a single capability id

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only status, side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits. It only describes the informational content, missing the opportunity to clarify safety or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is bilingual, doubling its length, but it is structured with a list of included topics. It front-loads the main purpose, though some redundancy between languages reduces conciseness. Adequate but not optimized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's purpose (returning a profile) and the absence of output schema, the description covers the main aspects: content type, filtering parameters, and brand differentiation. It does not detail result structure or pagination, but these are not critical for this informational tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little extra meaning beyond the schema. It restates the brand, detail level, language, and capability ID options without providing new context or formatting details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a profile of the CSIDIA group and its service catalogue, listing specific content like positioning, capabilities, and sectors. It also distinguishes between the csidia and splidia brands, making the purpose specific and differentiating it from siblings like search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings (fetch, match_use_case, search). The description does not mention contexts where this tool is preferred or alternatives, leaving the agent to infer usage from the purpose alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All CSIDIA — operational notes and capabilities toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: capabilities returns static profile, search finds articles, fetch retrieves full text, and match_use_case dynamically maps needs to capabilities. No functional overlap.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming is inconsistent: 'capabilities' is a noun, while 'fetch', 'search', and 'match_use_case' are verbs. No uniform pattern (e.g., all verbs or all noun_verb).

Tool Count5/5

With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose—providing company info, article search, and use-case matching. No redundancy or unnecessary tools.

Completeness5/5

Covers key operations: profile lookup, article search and retrieval, and intelligent need-to-capability matching. No obvious gaps for the stated domain of operational notes and capabilities.

Resources